ja-jp	３　第一項の規定による決定があった場合には、同項の破産手続において破産債権としての届出があった債権については、当該破産債権としての届出をした者（当該破産手続において当該届出があった債権について届出名義の変更を受けた者がある場合にあっては、その者。第五項において同じ。）が、第百三十八条第一項に規定する債権届出期間の初日に、更生債権の届出をしたものとみなす。
en-us	(3) If an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) is made, with regard to claims that have been filed as bankruptcy claims in the bankruptcy proceedings set forth in the same paragraph, it is deemed that the persons that have filed a proof of the bankruptcy claims (or persons that have received a change of the name of the holder of filed claims with regard to the claims filed in the bankruptcy proceedings, if there is any such person; the same applies in paragraph (5)) have filed a proof of reorganization claims on the first day of the period for filing a proof prescribed in Article 138, paragraph (1).

ja-jp	４　前項の場合においては、当該破産債権としての届出があった債権についての次の各号に掲げる事項の届出の区分に応じ、更生債権の届出としてそれぞれ当該各号に定める事項の届出をしたものとみなす。
en-us	(4) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, for each of the categories of filing a proof of particulars listed in the following items regarding the claim that has been filed as a bankruptcy claim, it is deemed that persons set forth in the preceding paragraph have filed a proof of the particulars specified in the respective items as filing a proof of reorganization claims:

ja-jp	一　破産法第九十九条第一項に規定する劣後的破産債権である旨の届出があった債権についての同法第百十一条第一項第一号に掲げる破産債権の額（同条第二項第二号に掲げる別除権の行使によって弁済を受けることができないと見込まれる債権の額の届出があった破産債権にあっては、当該債権の額。次号において同じ。）及び原因の届出　第百三十八条第一項第一号に掲げる更生債権の内容としての額及び同号に掲げる更生債権の原因の届出
en-us	(i) with regard to a claim that has been filed with a statement that the claim is a subordinate bankruptcy claim prescribed in Article 99, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, filing a proof of the amount of the bankruptcy claim set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act (or the amount of the bankruptcy claim for which payment is not expected to be received by exercising the right of separate satisfaction set forth in paragraph (2), item (ii) of the same Article, if a proof of the amount is filed; the same applies in the following item) and the cause of the bankruptcy claim: Filing a proof of the amount of the reorganization claim, as an element of the content of the reorganization claim set forth in Article 138, (1) item (i), and the cause of the reorganization claim set forth in the same item;

ja-jp	二　当該破産債権としての届出があった債権のうち前号に掲げる債権以外のものについての破産法第百十一条第一項第一号に掲げる破産債権の額及び原因の届出　第百三十八条第一項第一号に掲げる更生債権の内容としての額及び同項第三号に掲げる更生債権についての議決権の額並びに同項第一号に掲げる更生債権の原因の届出
en-us	(ii) with regard to the claim that has been filed as a bankruptcy claim, except for the claim set forth in the preceding item, filing a proof of the amount and cause of the bankruptcy claim set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Bankruptcy Act: Filing a proof of the amount of the reorganization claim, as an element of the content of the reorganization claim set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the voting right for the reorganization claim set forth in item (iii) of the same paragraph, and the cause of the reorganization claim set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph;

ja-jp	三　破産法第九十八条第一項に規定する優先的破産債権である旨の届出があった債権についての同法第百十一条第一項第二号に掲げるその旨の届出　第百三十八条第一項第二号に掲げる一般の優先権がある債権である旨の届出
en-us	(iii) with regard to a claim that has been filed with a statement that the claim is a preferred bankruptcy claim prescribed in Article 98, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, filing a proof of the statement set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the same Act: Filing a proof of the statement that the claim is a claim with general priority set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (ii); or

ja-jp	四　破産法第九十九条第二項に規定する約定劣後破産債権である旨の届出があった債権についての同法第百十一条第一項第三号に掲げるその旨の届出　第百三十八条第一項第二号に掲げる約定劣後更生債権である旨の届出
en-us	(iv) with regard to a claim that has been filed with a statement that the claim is a consensually-subordinated bankruptcy claim prescribed in Article 99, paragraph (2) of the Bankruptcy Act, filing a proof of the statement set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the same Act: Filing a proof of the statement that the claim is a consensually-subordinated reorganization claim set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (ii).

ja-jp	５　前二項の規定は、当該破産債権としての届出をした者が第百三十八条第一項に規定する債権届出期間内に更生債権の届出をした場合には、当該破産債権としての届出をした者が有する第三項の破産債権としての届出があった債権については、適用しない。
en-us	(5) When the person that filed a proof of a claim as a bankruptcy claim has filed a proof of a reorganization claim within the period for filing a proof of the claims prescribed in Article 138, paragraph (1), the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs do not apply to any claim filed as a bankruptcy claim set forth in paragraph (3), which is held by the person that has filed a proof of a claim as a bankruptcy claim.

ja-jp	第二節　再生手続から更生手続への移行
en-us	Section 2 Transfer from Rehabilitation Proceedings to Reorganization

ja-jp	（再生手続における管財人による更生手続開始の申立て）
en-us	(Petition to Commence Reorganization Filed by a Trustee in Charge of Rehabilitation Proceedings)

ja-jp	第二百四十八条　再生手続における管財人は、再生債務者である株式会社に第十七条第一項に規定する更生手続開始の原因となる事実があるときは、裁判所（再生事件を取り扱う一人の裁判官又は裁判官の合議体をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の許可を得て、当該株式会社について更生手続開始の申立てをすることができる。
en-us	Article 248 (1) A trustee in charge of rehabilitation proceedings, when a fact constituting the grounds for commencement of reorganization prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1) exists with regard to the stock company that is the rehabilitation debtor, may file a petition to commence reorganization against the stock company, with permission of the court (meaning a judge or panel of judges in charge of the rehabilitation case; hereinafter the same applies in this Article).

ja-jp	２　裁判所は、更生手続によることが債権者の一般の利益に適合すると認める場合に限り、前項の許可をすることができる。
en-us	(2) The court may grant the permission set forth in the preceding paragraph only when it finds that enforcing reorganization conforms to the common interests of creditors.

ja-jp	３　裁判所は、第一項の許可の申立てがあった場合には、当該申立てを却下すべきこと又は当該許可をすべきことが明らかである場合を除き、当該申立てについての決定をする前に、第二百四十六条第三項に規定する労働組合等の意見を聴かなければならない。
en-us	(3) If a petition for the permission set forth in paragraph (1) is filed, the court, except where it is obvious that the petition should be dismissed without prejudice or permission should be granted, must hear opinions from the labor union, etc. prescribed in Article 246, paragraph (3), before making an order on the petition.

ja-jp	４　第一項の規定による更生手続開始の申立てについては、第二十条第一項の規定は、適用しない。
en-us	(4) The provisions of Article 20, paragraph (1) do not apply to a petition to commence reorganization filed under the provisions of paragraph (1).

ja-jp	（更生債権の届出を要しない旨の決定）
en-us	(Order for Not Requiring Reporting Reorganization Claims)

ja-jp	第二百四十九条　裁判所は、更生手続開始の決定をする場合において、第五十条第一項の規定により中止することとなる再生手続において届出があった再生債権の内容及び原因、民事再生法第百五条第一項本文に規定する異議等のある再生債権の数、再生計画による権利の変更の有無及び内容その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、当該決定と同時に、更生債権であって当該再生手続において再生債権としての届出があったもの（同法第九十七条第一号に規定する再生手続開始前の罰金等を除く。以下この条において同じ。）を有する更生債権者は当該更生債権の届出をすることを要しない旨の決定をすることができる。
en-us	Article 249 (1) Where the court makes an order commencing reorganization, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the content and cause of each rehabilitation claim that has been filed in the rehabilitation proceedings to be stayed pursuant to the provisions of Article 50, paragraph (1), the number of disputed rehabilitation claims prescribed in the main clause of Article 105, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, whether or not any right will be modified by a rehabilitation plan and the content of the modification, and any other circumstances concerned, it may make an order, upon making the order commencing reorganization, to the effect that reorganization creditors that hold reorganization claims that have been filed as rehabilitation claims in the rehabilitation proceedings (excluding claims for a fine, etc. arising prior to the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings prescribed in Article 97, item (i) of the same Act; hereinafter the same applies in this Article) are not required to file a proof of the reorganization claims.

ja-jp	２　裁判所は、前項の規定による決定をしたときは、第四十三条第一項の規定による公告に、更生債権であって前項の再生手続において再生債権としての届出があったものを有する更生債権者は当該更生債権の届出をすることを要しない旨を掲げ、かつ、その旨を知れている更生債権者に通知しなければならない。
en-us	(2) The court, when it has made an order pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, must indicate, in the public notice to be given under the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), that reorganization creditors that hold reorganization claims that have been filed as rehabilitation claims in the rehabilitation proceedings set forth in the preceding paragraph are not required to file a proof of the reorganization claims, and must give a notice to known reorganization creditors to that effect.

ja-jp	３　第一項の規定による決定があった場合には、同項の再生手続において再生債権としての届出があった債権については、当該再生債権としての届出をした者（当該再生手続において当該届出があった債権について届出名義の変更を受けた者がある場合にあっては、その者。第五項において同じ。）が、第百三十八条第一項に規定する債権届出期間の初日に、更生債権の届出をしたものとみなす。
en-us	(3) If an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) is made, with regard to claims that have been filed as rehabilitation claims in the rehabilitation proceedings set forth in the same paragraph, it is deemed that the persons that have filed a proof of the rehabilitation claims (or persons that have received a change of the name of the holder of filed claims with regard to the claims filed in the rehabilitation proceedings, if there is any such person; the same applies in paragraph (5)) have filed a proof of reorganization claims on the first day of the period for filing a proof prescribed in Article 138, paragraph (1).

ja-jp	４　前項の場合においては、当該再生債権としての届出があった債権についての次の各号に掲げる事項の届出の区分に応じ、更生債権の届出としてそれぞれ当該各号に定める事項の届出をしたものとみなす。
en-us	(4) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, for each of the categories of filing a proof of particulars listed in the following items regarding the claim that has been filed as a rehabilitation claim, it is deemed that persons set forth in the preceding paragraph have filed a proof of particulars specified in the respective items as reporting a reorganization claim:

ja-jp	一　民事再生法第九十四条第二項に規定する別除権の行使によって弁済を受けることができないと見込まれる債権の額の届出があった債権についての当該債権の額並びに同条第一項に規定する再生債権の原因及び議決権の額の届出　第百三十八条第一項第一号に掲げる更生債権の内容としての額並びに同号に掲げる更生債権の原因及び同項第三号に掲げる更生債権についての議決権の額の届出
en-us	(i) with regard to a claim that has been filed with a proof of the amount of the claim for which payment is not expected to be received by exercising the right of separate satisfaction prescribed in Article 94, paragraph (2) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, filing a proof of the amount of the claim, and the cause of the rehabilitation claim and the amount of the voting right prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article: Filing a proof of the amount of the reorganization claim, as an element of the content of the reorganization claim set forth in Article 138, (1) item (i), the cause of the reorganization claim set forth in the same item, and the amount of the voting right for the reorganization claim set forth in item (iii);

ja-jp	二　当該再生債権としての届出があった債権のうち前号に掲げる債権以外のものについての民事再生法第九十四条第一項に規定する再生債権の内容及び原因並びに議決権の額の届出　第百三十八条第一項第一号に掲げる更生債権の内容及び原因並びに同項第三号に掲げる更生債権についての議決権の額の届出
en-us	(ii) with regard to the claim that has been filed as a rehabilitation claim, except for the claim set forth in the preceding item, filing a proof of the content and cause of the rehabilitation claim and the amount of the voting right prescribed in Article 94, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act: Filing a proof of the content and cause of the reorganization claim set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i), and the amount of the voting right for the reorganization claim set forth in item (iii) of the same paragraph; and

ja-jp	三　民事再生法第三十五条第四項に規定する約定劣後再生債権である旨の届出があった債権についての民事再生法第九十四条第一項に規定するその旨の届出　第百三十八条第一項第二号に掲げる約定劣後更生債権である旨の届出
en-us	(iii) with regard to a claim filed with a statement that the claim is a consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claim prescribed in Article 35, paragraph (4) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, filing a proof of the statement prescribed in Article 94, paragraph (1) of the same Act: Filing a proof of the statement that the claim is a consensually-subordinated reorganization claim set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (ii).

ja-jp	５　前二項の規定は、当該再生債権としての届出をした者が第百三十八条第一項に規定する債権届出期間内に更生債権の届出をした場合には、当該再生債権としての届出をした者が有する第三項の再生債権としての届出があった債権については、適用しない。
en-us	(5) When the person that filed a proof of a claim as a rehabilitation claim has filed a proof of a reorganization claim within the period for filing a proof of claims prescribed in Article 138, paragraph (1), the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs do not apply to any claim filed as a rehabilitation claim set forth in paragraph (3), which is held by the person that has filed a proof of a claim as a rehabilitation claim.

ja-jp	第三節　更生手続から破産手続への移行
en-us	Section 3 Transfer from Reorganization to Bankruptcy Proceedings

ja-jp	（更生手続開始の決定があった場合の破産事件の移送）
en-us	(Transfer of a Bankruptcy Case Where an Order Commencing Reorganization Has Been Made)

ja-jp	第二百五十条　裁判所（破産事件を取り扱う一人の裁判官又は裁判官の合議体をいう。）は、破産手続開始の前後を問わず、同一の債務者につき更生手続開始の決定があった場合において、当該破産事件を処理するために相当であると認めるときは、職権で、当該破産事件を更生裁判所に移送することができる。
en-us	Article 250 Where, before or after the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, an order commencing reorganization has been made against the same debtor, the court (meaning a judge or panel of judges in charge of the bankruptcy case), when it finds it appropriate in order to handle the bankruptcy case, by its own authority, may transfer the bankruptcy case to the reorganization court.

ja-jp	（更生手続終了前の破産手続開始の申立て等）
en-us	(Petition for Commencement of Bankruptcy Proceedings prior to the End of Reorganization)

ja-jp	第二百五十一条　破産手続開始前の更生会社について更生手続開始の決定の取消し、更生手続廃止又は更生計画不認可の決定があった場合には、第五十条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該決定の確定前においても、更生裁判所に当該更生会社についての破産手続開始の申立てをすることができる。破産手続開始後の更生会社について更生計画認可の決定により破産手続が効力を失った後に第二百四十一条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定があった場合も、同様とする。
en-us	Article 251 (1) When, with regard to the reorganizing company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, an order of revocation of the order commencing reorganization, an order of discontinuance of reorganization, or an order of disconfirmation of the reorganization plan is made, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50, paragraph (1), a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings may be filed with the reorganization court against the reorganizing company even before the respective order becomes final and binding. The same applies when, with regard to the reorganizing company against which bankruptcy proceedings have been commenced, an order of discontinuance of reorganization under the provisions of Article 241, paragraph (1) is made after the bankruptcy proceedings have ceased to be effective as a result of an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan being made.

ja-jp	２　前項前段の規定は、同項前段に規定する更生会社について既に開始された再生手続がある場合については、適用しない。
en-us	(2) The provisions of the first sentence of the preceding paragraph do not apply where rehabilitation proceedings have already been commenced against the reorganization company prescribed in the first sentence of the same paragraph.

ja-jp	３　第一項の規定による破産手続開始の申立てに係る破産手続開始の決定は、同項前段に規定する決定又は同項後段の更生手続廃止の決定が確定した後でなければ、することができない。
en-us	(3) An order commencing bankruptcy proceedings based on the petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings filed under the provisions of paragraph (1) may not be made unless an order prescribed in the first sentence of the same paragraph or an order of discontinuance of reorganization set forth in the second sentence of the same paragraph becomes final and binding.

ja-jp	（更生手続の終了に伴う職権による破産手続開始の決定）
en-us	(Order Commencing Bankruptcy Proceedings by Court's Authority upon the End of Reorganization)

ja-jp	第二百五十二条　破産手続開始前の株式会社について第二百三十四条第一号から第四号までに掲げる事由のいずれかが生じた場合において、裁判所は、当該株式会社に破産手続開始の原因となる事実があると認めるときは、職権で、破産法に従い、破産手続開始の決定をすることができる。ただし、当該株式会社について既に開始された再生手続がある場合は、この限りでない。
en-us	Article 252 (1) If any of the grounds listed in Article 234, item (i) through item (iv) occur with regard to a stock company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, the court, when it finds that a fact constituting the grounds for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings exists with regard to the stock company, by its own authority, may make an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act; provided, however, that this does not apply where rehabilitation proceedings have already been commenced against the stock company.

ja-jp	２　破産手続開始後の更生会社について更生計画認可の決定により破産手続が効力を失った後に第二百四十一条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定が確定した場合には、裁判所は、職権で、破産法に従い、破産手続開始の決定をしなければならない。ただし、前条第一項後段の規定による破産手続開始の申立てに基づいて破産手続開始の決定をする場合は、この限りでない。
en-us	(2) Where, after the bankruptcy proceedings commenced against the reorganizing company have ceased to be effective as a result of an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan being made, an order of discontinuance of reorganization under the provisions of Article 241, paragraph (1) becomes final and binding, the court, by its own authority, must make an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act; provided, however, that this does not apply when the court makes an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings based on a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings under the provisions of the second sentence of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article.

ja-jp	（更生手続の終了等に伴う破産手続開始前の保全処分等）
en-us	(Provisional Dispositions and Other Measures Prior to Commencement of Bankruptcy Proceedings upon Closing of Reorganization)

ja-jp	第二百五十三条　裁判所は、次に掲げる場合において、必要があると認めるときは、職権で、破産法第二十四条第一項の規定による中止の命令、同法第二十五条第二項に規定する包括的禁止命令、同法第二十八条第一項の規定による保全処分、同法第九十一条第二項に規定する保全管理命令又は同法第百七十一条第一項の規定による保全処分（以下この条及び第二百五十六条第四項において「保全処分等」という。）を命ずることができる。
en-us	Article 253 (1) In the following cases, the court, when it finds it necessary, by its own authority, may issue an order to stay under the provisions of Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, comprehensive prohibition order prescribed in Article 25, paragraph (2) of the same Act, provisional disposition under the provisions of Article 28, paragraph (1) of the same Act, order for temporary administration prescribed in Article 91, paragraph (2) of the same Act or provisional disposition under the provisions of Article 171, paragraph (1) of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "provisional disposition and other measures" in this Article and Article 256, paragraph (4)):

ja-jp	一　破産手続開始前の株式会社につき更生手続開始の申立ての棄却の決定があった場合
en-us	(i) when, with regard to a stock company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, an order of dismissal with prejudice on the merits of a petition to commence of reorganization is made;

ja-jp	二　破産手続開始前の更生会社につき更生手続開始の決定の取消し、更生手続廃止又は更生計画不認可の決定が確定した場合
en-us	(ii) when, with regard to the reorganizing company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, an order of revocation of the order commencing reorganization, an order of discontinuance of reorganization or an order of disconfirmation of the reorganization plan becomes final and binding; or

ja-jp	三　破産手続開始後の更生会社につき更生計画認可の決定により破産手続が効力を失った後に第二百四十一条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定が確定した場合
en-us	(iii) when, after the bankruptcy proceedings commenced against the reorganizing company have ceased to be effective as a result of an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan being made, an order of discontinuance of reorganization under the provisions of Article 241, paragraph (1) becomes final and binding.

ja-jp	２　裁判所は、前項第一号又は第二号の規定による保全処分等を命じた場合において、前条第一項本文の規定による破産手続開始の決定をしないこととしたときは、遅滞なく、当該保全処分等を取り消さなければならない。
en-us	(2) If the court, after issuing provisional dispositions or other measure under the provisions of item (i) or item (ii) of the preceding paragraph, has decided not to make an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings under the provisions of the main clause of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it must revoke the provisional disposition or other measure without delay.

ja-jp	３　第一項第一号の規定による保全処分等は、同号に規定する決定を取り消す決定があったときは、その効力を失う。
en-us	(3) The provisional disposition or other measures issued under the provisions of paragraph (1), item (i) will cease to be effective when an order to revoke the order prescribed in the same item is made.

ja-jp	４　破産法第二十四条第四項、第二十五条第六項、第二十八条第三項、第九十一条第五項及び第百七十一条第四項の規定にかかわらず、第二項の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができない。
en-us	(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 24, paragraph (4), Article 25, paragraph (6), Article 28, paragraph (3), Article 91, paragraph (5), and Article 171, paragraph (4) of the Bankruptcy Act, no immediate appeal may be filed against an order made under the provisions of paragraph (2).

ja-jp	（更生手続の終了に伴う破産手続における破産法の適用関係）
en-us	(Application of the Bankruptcy Act in Bankruptcy Proceedings upon the End of Reorganization)

ja-jp	第二百五十四条　破産手続開始前の株式会社に関する次に掲げる場合における破産法の関係規定（破産法第七十一条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第七十二条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第百六十条（第一項第一号を除く。）、第百六十二条（第一項第二号を除く。）、第百六十三条第二項、第百六十四条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十六条並びに第百六十七条第二項（同法第百七十条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定をいう。第三項において同じ。）の適用については、更生手続開始の申立て等（更生手続開始の申立て、更生手続開始によって効力を失った特別清算の手続における特別清算開始の申立て、更生計画認可の決定により効力を失った再生手続における再生手続開始の申立て又は破産法第二百六十五条の罪に該当することとなる当該株式会社の取締役、執行役若しくはこれらに準ずる者の行為をいう。以下この項において同じ。）は、当該更生手続開始の申立て等の前に破産手続開始の申立てがないときに限り、破産手続開始の申立てとみなす。
en-us	Article 254 (1) In the following cases concerning a stock company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, for the purpose of application of the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act (meaning the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, Article 71, paragraph (1), item (iv) and paragraph (2), item (ii) and item (iii), Article 72, paragraph (1), item (iv) and paragraph (2), item (ii) and item (iii), Article 160 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)), Article 162 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)), Article 163, paragraph (2), Article 164, paragraph (1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of the same Article), Article 166, and Article 167, paragraph (2) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 170, paragraph (2)); the same applies in paragraph (3)), a petition to commence reorganization, etc. (meaning a petition to commence reorganization, a petition to commence special liquidation in the proceedings for special liquidation that have ceased to be effective as a result of the commencement of reorganization, a petition to commence rehabilitation proceedings in the rehabilitation proceedings that have ceased to be effective as a result of the order of confirmation of the reorganization plan, or any act conducted by the stock company's director, executive officer, or any other person equivalent thereto, which constitutes the crime set forth in Article 265 of the Bankruptcy Act; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph) is deemed to be a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings only when no petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings has been filed prior to the petition to commence reorganization, etc.:

ja-jp	一　第二百五十二条第一項本文の規定による破産手続開始の決定があった場合
en-us	(i) when an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is made under the provisions of the main clause of Article 252, paragraph (1);

ja-jp	二　更生手続開始の申立ての棄却の決定の確定前にされた破産手続開始の申立てに基づき、当該決定の確定後に破産手続開始の決定があった場合
en-us	(ii) when, based on a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings filed before an order of dismissal with prejudice on the merits of a petition to commence reorganization becomes final and binding, an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is made after the order of dismissal becomes final and binding;

ja-jp	三　更生手続開始の決定前にされた破産手続開始の申立てに基づき、第二百三十四条第二号若しくは第三号に掲げる事由の発生後又は第二百三十六条若しくは第二百三十七条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定の確定後に、破産手続開始の決定があった場合
en-us	(iii) when, based on a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings filed before an order commencing reorganization is made, an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is made after any of the grounds listed in Article 234, item (ii) or item (iii) occur or after an order of discontinuance of reorganization made under the provisions of Article 236 or Article 237, paragraph (1) becomes final and binding; or

ja-jp	四　第二百五十一条第一項前段の規定による破産手続開始の申立てに基づき、破産手続開始の決定があった場合
en-us	(iv) when, based on a petition to commence bankruptcy filed under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 251, paragraph (1), an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is made.

ja-jp	２　更生計画不認可又は更生手続廃止の決定の確定による更生手続の終了に伴い前項各号に規定する破産手続開始の決定があった場合における破産法第百七十六条前段の規定の適用については、次に掲げる決定の日を同条前段の破産手続開始の日とみなす。
en-us	(2) For the purpose of application of the provisions of the first sentence of Article 176 of the Bankruptcy Act when an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of the preceding paragraph is made upon the end of reorganization as a result of an order of disconfirmation of the reorganization plan or order of discontinuance of reorganization becoming final and binding, the date of any of the following orders is deemed to be the date of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings set forth in the first sentence of the same Article:

ja-jp	一　更生手続開始の決定
en-us	(i) the order commencing reorganization; or

ja-jp	二　更生計画認可の決定により効力を失った再生手続における再生手続開始の決定
en-us	(ii) the order commencing rehabilitation proceedings in the rehabilitation proceedings that have ceased to be effective as a result of the order of confirmation of the reorganization plan.

ja-jp	３　破産手続開始後の更生会社について第二百五十一条第一項後段の規定による破産手続開始の申立てに基づいて破産手続開始の決定があった場合又は第二百五十二条第二項の規定による破産手続開始の決定があった場合における破産法の関係規定の適用については、更生計画認可の決定によって効力を失った破産手続における破産手続開始の申立てがあった時に破産手続開始の申立てがあったものとみなす。
en-us	(3) For the purpose of application of the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act where, with regard to the reorganizing company against which bankruptcy proceedings have already been commenced, an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is made based on a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings filed under the provisions of the second sentence of Article 251, paragraph (1) or an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is made under the provisions of Article 252, paragraph (2), it is deemed that a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings is filed at the time when the petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings is filed in the bankruptcy proceedings that have ceased to be effective as a result of an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan being made.

ja-jp	４　前項に規定する破産手続開始の決定があった場合における破産法第百七十六条前段の規定の適用については、更生計画認可の決定によって効力を失った破産手続における破産手続開始の日を同条前段の破産手続開始の日とみなす。
en-us	(4) For the purpose of application of the provisions of the first sentence of Article 176 of the Bankruptcy Act in cases where an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the preceding paragraph is made, the date of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings in the bankruptcy proceedings that have ceased to be effective as a result of an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan being made is deemed to be the date of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings set forth in the first sentence of the same Article.

ja-jp	５　第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定があった場合における破産法第百四十八条第一項第三号の規定の適用については、同号中「包括的禁止命令」とあるのは「包括的禁止命令若しくは会社更生法第二十五条第二項に規定する包括的禁止命令」と、「期間がある」とあるのは「期間又は同法第五十条第二項の規定により国税滞納処分をすることができない期間がある」とする。
en-us	(5) For the purpose of application of the provisions of Article 148, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Bankruptcy Act when an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of paragraph (1) or in paragraph (3) is made, the phrase " comprehensive prohibition order" is replaced with a "comprehensive prohibition order or a comprehensive prohibition order prescribed in Article 25, paragraph (2) of the Corporate Reorganization Act", and "for a certain part of the one-year period" is replaced with " a certain part of the one-year period or a disposition of national tax delinquency may not be enforced for a certain part of the one-year period under Article 50, paragraph (2) of the same Act".

ja-jp	６　前項に規定する破産手続開始の決定があった場合には、共益債権（更生手続が開始されなかった場合における第六十二条第二項並びに第百二十八条第一項及び第四項に規定する請求権を含む。第二百五十七条において同じ。）は、財団債権とする。破産手続開始後の株式会社について第二百三十四条第一号から第三号までに掲げる事由の発生又は第二百三十六条若しくは第二百三十七条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定の確定によって破産手続が続行された場合も、同様とする。
en-us	(6) If an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the preceding paragraph is made, common-benefit claims (including the claims prescribed in Article 62, paragraph (2) and Article 128, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) when reorganization is not commenced; the same applies in Article 257) will be claims on the estate. The same applies when bankruptcy proceedings commenced against a stock company are continued as a result of the occurrence of any of the grounds listed in Article 234, item (i) through item (iii) or an order of discontinuance of reorganization under the provisions of Article 236 or Article 237, paragraph (1) becoming final and binding.

ja-jp	（破産債権の届出を要しない旨の決定）
en-us	(Order for Not Requiring Reporting Bankruptcy Claims)

ja-jp	第二百五十五条　裁判所（破産事件を取り扱う一人の裁判官又は裁判官の合議体をいう。次項において同じ。）は、前条第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定をする場合において、終了した更生手続において届出があった更生債権等の内容及び原因並びに議決権の額、第百五十一条第一項本文に規定する異議等のある更生債権等の数、更生計画による権利の変更の有無及び内容その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、当該決定と同時に、破産債権であって当該更生手続において更生債権等としての届出があったもの（租税等の請求権及び第百四十二条第二号に規定する更生手続開始前の罰金等の請求権を除く。以下この条において同じ。）を有する破産債権者は当該破産債権の届出をすることを要しない旨の決定をすることができる。
en-us	Article 255 (1) Where the court (meaning a judge or panel of judges in charge of the bankruptcy case; the same applies in the following paragraph) makes an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or in paragraph (3) of the same Article, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the content and cause of each reorganization claim, etc. as well as the amount of the voting right as filed in the reorganization that have been closed, the number of disputed reorganization claims, etc. prescribed in the main clause of Article 151, paragraph (1), whether or not any right will be modified by a reorganization plan and the content of the modification, and any other circumstances concerned, it may make an order, upon making the order commencing bankruptcy proceedings, to the effect that bankruptcy creditors that hold bankruptcy claims, a proof of which has been filed as reorganization claims, etc. in the reorganization (excluding claims for taxes, etc. and claims for fine, etc. arising prior to the commencement of reorganization prescribed in Article 142, item (ii); hereinafter the same applies in this Article) are not required to file a proof of the bankruptcy claims.

ja-jp	２　裁判所は、前項の規定による決定をしたときは、破産法第三十二条第一項の規定による公告に、破産債権であって前項の更生手続において更生債権等としての届出があったものを有する破産債権者は当該破産債権の届出をすることを要しない旨を掲げ、かつ、その旨を知れている破産債権者に通知しなければならない。
en-us	(2) The court, when it has made an order pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, must indicate, in the public notice to be given under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, that bankruptcy creditors that hold bankruptcy claims, the proof of which have been filed as reorganization claims, etc. in the reorganization set forth in the preceding paragraph, are not required to file a proof of the bankruptcy claims, and must give a notice to known bankruptcy creditors to that effect.

ja-jp	３　第一項の規定による決定があった場合には、同項の更生手続において更生債権等としての届出があった債権については、当該更生債権等としての届出をした者（当該更生手続において当該届出があった債権について届出名義の変更を受けた者がある場合にあっては、その者。第六項において同じ。）が、破産法第百十一条第一項に規定する債権届出期間の初日に、破産債権の届出（同項第四号に掲げる事項の届出を含む。）をしたものとみなす。
en-us	(3) If an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) is made, with regard to claims the proof of which has been filed as Reorganization Claims, etc. in the reorganization set forth in the same paragraph, it is deemed that the persons that have filed a proof of the reorganization claims, etc. (or persons that have received a change of the name of the holder of the filed claims with regard to the claims filed in the reorganization, if there is any such person; the same applies in paragraph (6)) have filed a proof of bankruptcy claims (including a proof of the particulars set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Bankruptcy Act) on the first day of the period for filing a proof of claims prescribed in Article 111, paragraph (1) of the same Act.

ja-jp	４　前項の場合においては、当該更生債権等としての届出があった債権についての次の各号に掲げる事項の届出の区分に応じ、破産債権の届出としてそれぞれ当該各号に定める事項の届出をしたものとみなす。
en-us	(4) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, for each of the categories of filing a proof of particulars listed in the following items regarding the claims that have been filed as a reorganization claim, etc., it is deemed that a person set forth in the preceding paragraph has filed the particulars specified in the respective items as filing a proof of a bankruptcy claim:

ja-jp	一　第百三十六条第一項第三号ロからニまでに掲げる債権についての第百三十八条第一項第三号又は第二項第三号に掲げる更生債権等についての議決権の額及び同条第一項第一号又は第二項第一号に掲げる更生債権等の原因の届出　破産法第百十一条第一項第一号に掲げる破産債権の額及び原因の届出
en-us	(i) with regard to any of the claims listed in Article 136, paragraph (1), item (iii)(b) through (d), filing a proof of the amount of the voting right for the reorganization claim, etc. set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (iii) or paragraph (2), item (iii), and the cause of the reorganization claim, etc. set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i) or paragraph (2), item (i): Filing a proof of the amount and cause of the bankruptcy claim set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Bankruptcy Act;

ja-jp	二　更生債権等としての届出があった債権のうち前号に掲げる債権以外のものについての第百三十八条第一項第一号又は第二項第一号に掲げる更生債権等の内容としての額及び同条第一項第一号又は第二項第一号に掲げる更生債権等の原因の届出　破産法第百十一条第一項第一号に掲げる破産債権の額及び原因の届出
en-us	(ii) with regard to the claim that has been filed as a reorganization claim, etc., except for the claim set forth in the preceding item, filing a proof of the amount of the reorganization claim, etc., as an element of the content of the reorganization claim, etc., set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i) or paragraph (2), item (i), and the cause of the reorganization claim, etc. set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i) or paragraph (2), item (i): Filing a proof of the amount and cause of the bankruptcy claim set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (i);

ja-jp	三　第百三十六条第一項第一号、第二号又は第三号イに掲げる債権についての第百三十八条第一項第一号又は第二項第一号に掲げる更生債権等の内容としての額及び同条第一項第三号又は第二項第三号に掲げる更生債権等についての議決権の額の届出　届出があった更生債権等の内容としての額から届出があった更生債権等についての議決権の額を控除した額に係る部分につき破産法第百十一条第一項第三号に掲げる劣後的破産債権である旨の届出
en-us	(iii) with regard to any of the claims listed in Article 136, paragraph (1), item (i), item (ii), or item (iii)(a), filing a proof of the amount of the reorganization claim, etc., as an element of the content of the reorganization claim, etc., set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i) or paragraph (2), item (i), and the amount of the voting right for the reorganization claim, etc. set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (iii) or paragraph (2), item (iii): Filing a proof of the statement that the claim in question is a subordinate bankruptcy claim set forth in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Bankruptcy Act for its part corresponding to the amount obtained by deducting the amount of the voting right for the filed reorganization claim, etc. from the amount of the filed reorganization claim, etc., which is an element of the content thereof;

ja-jp	四　第百三十六条第二項第一号から第三号までに掲げる債権についての第百三十八条第一項第一号又は第二項第一号に掲げる更生債権等の内容の届出　破産法第百十一条第一項第三号に掲げる劣後的破産債権である旨の届出
en-us	(iv) with regard to any of the claims listed in Article 136, paragraph (2), item (i) through item (iii), filing a proof of the content of the reorganization claim, etc. listed in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (i) or paragraph (2), item (i): Filing a proof of the statement that the claim is a subordinated bankruptcy claim prescribed in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Bankruptcy Act;

ja-jp	五　一般の優先権がある債権である旨の届出があった債権についての第百三十八条第一項第二号に掲げるその旨の届出　破産法第百十一条第一項第二号に掲げる優先的破産債権である旨の届出
en-us	(v) with regard to a claim that has been filed with a statement that the claim is a claim with general priority, filing a proof of the statement set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (ii): Filing a proof of the statement that the claim is a preferred bankruptcy claim prescribed in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Bankruptcy Act;

ja-jp	六　約定劣後更生債権である旨の届出があった債権についての第百三十八条第一項第二号に掲げるその旨の届出　破産法第百十一条第一項第三号に掲げる約定劣後破産債権である旨の届出
en-us	(vi) with regard to a claim that has been filed with a statement that the claim is a consensually-subordinated reorganization claim, filing a proof of the statement set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (ii): Filing a proof of the statement that the claim is a consensually-subordinated bankruptcy claim prescribed in Article 111, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Bankruptcy Act; or

ja-jp	七　更生手続開始当時更生会社の財産につき存する担保権（特別の先取特権、質権、抵当権及び商法又は会社法の規定による留置権に限る。次項において同じ。）の被担保債権である更生債権についての第百三十八条第一項第三号に掲げる議決権の額の届出　破産法第百十一条第二項第二号に掲げる別除権の行使によって弁済を受けることができないと見込まれる債権の額の届出
en-us	(vii) with regard to a reorganization claim secured by any security right (limited to a special statutory lien, pledge, mortgage, and right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act; the same applies in the following paragraph) that exists on the reorganizing company's assets as of the time of commencement of reorganization, filing a proof of the amount of the voting right set forth in Article 138, paragraph (1), item (iii): Filing a proof of the amount of the claim for which payment is not expected to be received by exercising the right of separate satisfaction set forth in Article 111, paragraph (2), item (ii) of the Bankruptcy Act.

ja-jp	５　前二項の場合においては、更生手続開始当時更生会社の財産につき存する担保権の被担保債権であって更生債権としての届出及び更生担保権としての届出の双方の届出があったものについて届出をしたものとみなされる破産債権の額は、前項の規定により当該更生債権及び当該更生担保権のそれぞれについて破産債権の額として届出をしたものとみなされる額を合算したものとする。
en-us	(5) In the cases referred to in the preceding two paragraphs, the amount of the bankruptcy claim, which is secured by any security right that exists on the reorganizing company's assets as of the time of commencement of reorganization and which is deemed to have been filed both as a reorganization claim and a secured reorganization claim, will be the sum of the amount of the reorganization claim and the amount of the secured reorganization claim each of which is deemed to have been filed as the amount of the bankruptcy claim pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

ja-jp	６　前三項の規定は、当該更生債権等としての届出をした者が破産法第百十一条第一項に規定する債権届出期間内に破産債権の届出をした場合には、当該更生債権等としての届出をした者が有する第三項の更生債権等としての届出があった債権については、適用しない。
en-us	(6) When the person that filed a proof of a claim as a reorganization claim, etc. has filed a proof of a bankruptcy claim within the period for filing a proof of claims prescribed in Article 111, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply to any claim filed as a reorganization claim, etc. set forth in paragraph (3), which is held by the person that filed a proof of a claim as a reorganization claim, etc.

ja-jp	（否認の請求を認容する決定に対する異議の訴え等の取扱い）
en-us	(Handling Actions to Oppose Orders Upholding a Request for Avoidance)

ja-jp	第二百五十六条　第二百三十四条第三号又は第四号に掲げる事由が生じた場合において、第二百五十四条第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定があったときは、第五十二条第四項の規定により中断した第九十七条第一項の訴えに係る訴訟手続は、破産管財人においてこれを受け継ぐことができる。この場合においては、受継の申立ては、相手方もすることができる。
en-us	Article 256 (1) If any of the grounds listed in Article 234, item (iii) or item (iv) occur, if an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of Article 254, paragraph (1) or in paragraph (3) of the same Article is made, a bankruptcy trustee may take over an action set forth in Article 97, paragraph (1) that is discontinued pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (4). In this case, a petition for taking over the action may also be filed by the opponent.

ja-jp	２　前項の場合においては、相手方の管財人に対する訴訟費用請求権は、財団債権とする。
en-us	(2) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the opponent's claim for court costs against a trustee will be a claim on the estate.

ja-jp	３　第一項の場合において、第五十二条第四項の規定により中断した第九十七条第一項の訴えに係る訴訟手続について第一項の規定による受継があるまでに破産手続が終了したときは、当該訴訟手続は、終了する。
en-us	(3) In the case referred to in paragraph (1), if the bankruptcy proceedings are closed before the action set forth in Article 97, paragraph (1) discontinued pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (4) is taken over under the provisions of paragraph (1), the action will be closed.

ja-jp	４　第五十二条第四項の規定により中断した第九十七条第一項の訴えに係る訴訟手続であって破産手続開始前の株式会社についての更生事件に係るものは、その中断の日から一月（その期間中に第二百五十三条第一項第一号若しくは第二号の規定による保全処分等又は第二百五十四条第二項各号に掲げる破産手続開始の申立てに係る破産手続における保全処分等がされていた期間があるときは、当該期間を除く。）以内に第二百五十四条第一項各号に規定する破産手続開始の決定がされていないときは、終了する。
en-us	(4) An action set forth in Article 97, paragraph (1), which is discontinued pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (4) and pertains to a reorganization case involving the stock company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, will be closed if an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of Article 254, paragraph (1) is not made within one month from the date of discontinuance of the action (if, for a certain part of the one-month period, provisional dispositions and other measures are issued under the provisions of Article 253, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) or a provisional disposition, etc. is issued in bankruptcy proceedings based on a petition to commence bankruptcy proceedings set forth in the items of Article 254, paragraph (2), the part of the period will be excluded).

ja-jp	５　第百六十三条第一項の規定により引き続き係属するものとされる第百五十一条第一項本文に規定する更生債権等査定申立ての手続及び第百五十三条第一項に規定する価額決定の申立ての手続は、第二百五十四条第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定があったときは、終了するものとする。この場合においては、第百六十三条第三項の規定は、適用しない。
en-us	(5) The proceedings for a petition for assessment of reorganization claim, etc. prescribed in the main clause of Article 151, paragraph (1) and the proceedings for a petition for valuation prescribed in Article 153, paragraph (1), both of which continue to be pending pursuant to the provisions of Article 163, paragraph(1), is to be closed when an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of Article 254, paragraph (1) or in paragraph (3) of the same Article is made. In this case, the provisions of Article 163, paragraph (3) do not apply.

ja-jp	６　第四項の規定は、第百六十三条第四項の規定により中断した第百五十二条第一項に規定する更生債権等査定異議の訴えに係る訴訟手続であって破産手続開始前の株式会社についての更生事件に係るものについて準用する。
en-us	(6) The provisions of paragraph (4) apply mutatis mutandis to an action to oppose assessment of reorganization claim, etc. prescribed in Article 152, paragraph (1), which is discontinued pursuant to the provisions of Article 163, paragraph (4) and pertains to a reorganization case involving the stock company against which bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced.

ja-jp	第四節　更生手続の終了に伴う再生手続の続行
en-us	Section 4 Continuation of Rehabilitation Proceedings after the Reorganization

ja-jp	第二百五十七条　株式会社について再生事件が係属している場合において、第二百三十四条第一号から第三号までに掲げる事由の発生又は第二百三十六条若しくは第二百三十七条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定の確定によって再生手続が続行されたときは、共益債権は、再生手続における共益債権とする。
en-us	Article 257 If a rehabilitation case is pending against a stock company, when the rehabilitation proceedings are continued as a result of the occurrence of any of the grounds listed in Article 234, item (i) through item (iii) or an order of discontinuance of reorganization under the provisions of Article 236 or Article 237, paragraph (1) becoming final and binding, common-benefits claims in the reorganization will be common benefit claims in the rehabilitation proceedings.

ja-jp	第十二章　雑則
en-us	Chapter XII Miscellaneous Provisions

ja-jp	（更生会社についての登記の嘱託等）
en-us	(Commission of Registration on a Reorganizing Company)

ja-jp	第二百五十八条　更生手続開始の決定があったときは、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、更生手続開始の登記を更生会社の本店（外国に本店があるときは、日本における営業所。第四項及び次条第一項において同じ。）の所在地の登記所に嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	Article 258 (1) If an order commencing reorganization is made, a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission the registry office having jurisdiction over the location of the head office of the reorganizing company (if the company has its head office in a foreign state, its business office in Japan; the same applies in paragraph (4), and paragraph (1) of the following Article) to make a registration of the commencement of reorganization.

ja-jp	２　前項の登記には、管財人の氏名又は名称及び住所、管財人がそれぞれ単独にその職務を行うことについて第六十九条第一項ただし書の許可があったときはその旨並びに管財人が職務を分掌することについて同項ただし書の許可があったときはその旨及び各管財人が分掌する職務の内容をも登記しなければならない。
en-us	(2) When making the registration set forth in the preceding paragraph, the name and address of each trustee, if permission set forth in the proviso to Article 69, paragraph (1) is granted for independent performance of duties by each trustee, a statement to that effect, and if permission set forth in the proviso of the same paragraph is granted for division of duties among trustees, a statement to that effect and the contents of the duties assigned to each trustee must also be registered.

ja-jp	３　第一項の規定は、前項に規定する事項に変更が生じた場合について準用する。
en-us	(3) The provisions of paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis when there is a change to any of the particulars prescribed in the preceding paragraph.

ja-jp	４　開始前会社について保全管理命令又は監督命令がされたときは、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、保全管理命令又は監督命令の登記を開始前会社の本店の所在地の登記所に嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(4) When an order for temporary administration or supervision order is issued against the company awaiting reorganization, a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission the registry office having jurisdiction over the head office of the company awaiting reorganization to make a registration of the order.

ja-jp	５　前項の登記には、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める事項をも登記しなければならない。
en-us	(5) When making the registration set forth in the preceding paragraph, the particulars specified in each of the following items must also be registered for the categories of registrations listed in the respective items:

ja-jp	一　前項に規定する保全管理命令の登記　保全管理人の氏名又は名称及び住所、保全管理人がそれぞれ単独にその職務を行うことについて第三十四条第一項において準用する第六十九条第一項ただし書の許可があったときはその旨並びに保全管理人が職務を分掌することについて第三十四条第一項において準用する第六十九条第一項ただし書の許可があったときはその旨及び各保全管理人が分掌する職務の内容
en-us	(i) registration of an order for temporary administration prescribed in the preceding paragraph: The names and addresses of the provisional administrators, if permission set forth in the proviso to Article 69, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34, paragraph (1), is granted for independent performance of duties by each provisional administrator, a statement to that effect, and if permission set forth in the proviso of Article 69, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34, paragraph (1), is granted for division of duties among provisional administrators, a statement to that effect and the contents of the duties assigned to each provisional administrator; and

ja-jp	二　前項に規定する監督命令の登記　監督委員の氏名又は名称及び住所並びに第三十五条第二項の規定により指定された行為
en-us	(ii) registration of a supervision order prescribed in the preceding paragraph: The names and addresses of supervisors, and the acts designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 35, paragraph (2).

ja-jp	６　第四項の規定は、同項に規定する裁判の変更若しくは取消しがあった場合又は前項に規定する事項に変更が生じた場合について準用する。
en-us	(6) The provisions of paragraph (4) apply mutatis mutandis when a judicial decision prescribed in the same paragraph is changed or revoked or there is a change to any of the particulars prescribed in the preceding paragraph.

ja-jp	７　第一項の規定は、更生計画認可の決定があった場合又は第二百三十四条第二号から第五号までに掲げる事由が生じた場合について準用する。
en-us	(7) The provisions of paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis when an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan is made or when any of the grounds listed in Article 234, item (ii) through item (v) occur.

ja-jp	８　登記官は、第一項の規定により更生手続開始の登記をする場合において、更生会社について特別清算開始の登記があるときは、職権で、その登記を抹消しなければならない。
en-us	(8) A registrar, when making a registration of the commencement of reorganization pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), by their own authority, must cancel a registration of the commencement of special liquidation against the reorganizing company, if there is any such registration.

ja-jp	９　登記官は、第七項の規定により更生手続開始の決定の取消しの登記をする場合において、前項の規定により抹消した登記があるときは、職権で、その登記を回復しなければならない。
en-us	(9) A registrar, when making a registration of the revocation of an order commencing reorganization pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7), by their own authority, must restore a registration cancelled under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if there is any such registration.

ja-jp	１０　第八項の規定は更生計画認可の登記をする場合における破産手続開始又は再生手続開始の登記について、前項の規定は更生計画認可の決定を取り消す決定が確定した場合におけるこの項において準用する第八項の規定により抹消した登記について、それぞれ準用する。
en-us	(10) The provisions of paragraph (8) apply mutatis mutandis to a registration of the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings or commencement of rehabilitation proceedings in the case of making a registration of the confirmation of the reorganization plan, and the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to a registration cancelled pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, if an order to revoke the order of confirmation of the reorganization plan becomes respectively final and binding.

ja-jp	第二百五十九条　第七十二条第四項前段の規定により更生会社の機関がその権限を回復したときは、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、その旨の登記を更生会社の本店の所在地の登記所に嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	Article 259 (1) When the organs of the reorganizing company have restored their powers pursuant to the provisions of the first sentence of Article 72, paragraph (4), a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission the registry office having jurisdiction over the location of the reorganizing company's head office to make a registration to that effect.

ja-jp	２　前項の規定は、第七十二条第四項前段の規定による更生計画の定め又は裁判所の決定が取り消された場合について準用する。
en-us	(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis when provisions of a reorganization plan or an order of the court under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 72, paragraph (4) is revoked.

ja-jp	（登記のある権利についての登記の嘱託等）
en-us	(Commission of Registration on Registered Rights)

ja-jp	第二百六十条　次に掲げる場合には、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、当該保全処分の登記を嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	Article 260 (1) In the following cases, a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission a registration of the provisional disposition concerned:

ja-jp	一　開始前会社に属する権利で登記がされたものに関し第二十八条第一項（第四十四条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による保全処分があったとき。
en-us	(i) when a provisional disposition under the provisions of Article 28, paragraph (1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 44, paragraph (2)) is issued with respect to any registered right that belongs to the company awaiting reorganization; or

ja-jp	二　登記のある権利に関し第三十九条の二第一項若しくは第四十条第一項（これらの規定を第四十四条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第九十九条第一項の規定による保全処分があったとき。
en-us	(ii) when a provisional disposition under the provisions of Article 39-2, paragraph (1) or Article 40, paragraph (1) (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 44, paragraph (2)) or Article 99, paragraph (1) is issued with respect to any registered right.

ja-jp	２　前項の規定は、同項に規定する保全処分の変更若しくは取消しがあった場合又は当該保全処分が効力を失った場合について準用する。
en-us	(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis when the provisional disposition prescribed in the same paragraph is changed or revoked or the provisional disposition ceases to be effective.

ja-jp	３　裁判所書記官は、更生手続開始の決定があった場合において、更生会社に属する権利で登記がされたものについて会社法第九百三十八条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による登記があることを知ったときは、職権で、遅滞なく、その登記の抹消を嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(3) If an order commencing reorganization is made, a court clerk, when they become aware that there is a registration under the provisions of Article 938, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of the same Article) with regard to any registered right that belongs to the reorganizing company must commission cancellation of the registration by their own authority without delay.

ja-jp	４　前項の規定による登記の抹消がされた場合において、更生手続開始の決定を取り消す決定が確定したときは、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、同項の規定により抹消された登記の回復を嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(4) If a registration is cancelled under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, when an order to revoke the order commencing reorganization has become final and binding, a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission restoration of the registration cancelled under the provisions of the same paragraph.

ja-jp	（更生計画の遂行等に関する登記の嘱託等）
en-us	(Commission of Registration on Implementation of a Reorganization Plan)

ja-jp	第二百六十一条　第二百五十八条第一項の規定は、更生計画の遂行又はこの法律の規定により更生手続終了前に更生会社又は更生計画の定めにより設立される会社について登記すべき事項が生じた場合について準用する。この場合において、会社法第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項について登記すべき事項が生じたときは、第二百五十八条第一項中「の本店」とあるのは、「の本店及び支店」と読み替えるものとする。
en-us	Article 261 (1) The provisions of Article 258, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis when any matter to be registered has arisen from the implementation of the reorganization plan or the provisions of this Act, before the end of reorganization, with regard to the reorganizing company or the company to be incorporated pursuant to the provisions of the reorganization plan. In this case, when any matter to be registered has arisen with regard to the particulars listed in the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act, the term "the head office" in Article 258, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "the head office and the branch office(s)".

ja-jp	２　更生会社が他の会社と合併をする場合において、裁判所書記官が次に掲げる登記を嘱託するときは、合併の相手方である他の会社の解散の登記をも嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(2) When the reorganizing company effects a merger with another company, when a court clerk commissions the following registrations, they must also commission a registration of the dissolution of the other company that is the partner of the merger:

ja-jp	一　吸収合併後存続する更生会社の吸収合併による変更の登記
en-us	(i) a registration of change due to an absorption-type merger, in relation to the reorganizing company that survives the absorption-type merger; or

ja-jp	二　新設合併により設立する会社の新設合併による設立の登記
en-us	(ii) a registration of incorporation due to a consolidation-type merger, in relation to the company that is incorporated in the consolidation-type merger.

ja-jp	３　第一項の規定は、他の会社が更生会社と吸収合併をして吸収合併後存続する場合における更生会社の解散の登記については、適用しない。
en-us	(3) The provisions of paragraph (1) do not apply to a registration of dissolution of the reorganizing company when another company effects an absorption-type merger with the reorganizing company and survives the absorption-type merger.

ja-jp	４　更生会社が他の会社と吸収分割をする場合において、裁判所書記官が更生会社の吸収分割による変更の登記を嘱託するときは、当該他の会社の吸収分割による変更の登記をも嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(4) When the reorganizing company effects an absorption-type company split with another company, when a court clerk commissions a registration of change due to an absorption-type split in relation to the reorganizing company, they must also commission a registration of change due to an absorption-type company split in relation to the other company.

ja-jp	５　更生会社が他の会社と共同して新設分割をする場合において、裁判所書記官が新設分割による設立の登記を嘱託するときは、当該他の会社の新設分割による変更の登記をも嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(5) When the reorganizing company effects an incorporation-type company split jointly with another company, when a court clerk commissions a registration of incorporation due to an incorporation-type company split, they must also commission a registration of change due to an incorporation-type company split in relation to the other company.

ja-jp	６　前条第一項の規定は、更生計画の遂行により更生手続終了前に登記のある権利の得喪又は変更が生じた場合について準用する。ただし、更生会社、更生債権者等、株主及び更生計画の定めにより設立される会社以外の者を権利者とする登記については、この限りでない。
en-us	(6) The provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis when acquisition, loss, or modification of any registered right occurs prior to the end of reorganization as a result of the implementation of the reorganization plan; provided, however, that this does not apply to a registration of any right if the right holder is a person other than the reorganizing company, reorganization creditors, etc., shareholders, or the company to be incorporated pursuant to the provisions of the reorganization plan.

ja-jp	（否認の登記）
en-us	(Registration of Avoidance)

ja-jp	第二百六十二条　登記の原因である行為が否認されたときは、管財人は、否認の登記を申請しなければならない。登記が否認されたときも、同様とする。
en-us	Article 262 (1) If any act constituting the cause of registration is avoided, a trustee must apply for a registration of avoidance. The same applies where a registration is avoided.

ja-jp	２　登記官は、前項の否認の登記に係る権利に関する登記をするときは、職権で、次に掲げる登記を抹消しなければならない。
en-us	(2) A registrar, when making a registration of a right pertaining to the registration of avoidance set forth in the preceding paragraph, by their own authority, must cancel the following registrations:

ja-jp	一　当該否認の登記
en-us	(i) the registration of avoidance in question;

ja-jp	二　否認された行為を登記原因とする登記又は否認された登記
en-us	(ii) the registration the cause of which is the avoided act, or the avoided registration; and

ja-jp	三　前号の登記に後れる登記があるときは、当該登記
en-us	(iii) any subsequent registration made after the registration set forth in the preceding item.

ja-jp	３　前項に規定する場合において、否認された行為の後否認の登記がされるまでの間に、同項第二号に掲げる登記に係る権利を目的とする第三者の権利に関する登記（更生手続の関係において、その効力を主張することができるものに限る。第五項において同じ。）がされているときは、同項の規定にかかわらず、登記官は、職権で、当該否認の登記の抹消及び同号に掲げる登記に係る権利の更生会社への移転の登記をしなければならない。
en-us	(3) In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if, after any act which is avoided was conducted until a registration of avoidance is made, a registration of a third party's right (limited to the registration the effect of which may be asserted in relation to reorganization; the same applies in paragraph (5)), the subject matter of which is the right pertaining to the registration set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, is made, a registrar, notwithstanding the provisions of the same paragraph, by their own authority, must cancel the registration of avoidance and make a registration of the transfer of the right pertaining to the registration set forth in the same item to the reorganizing company.

ja-jp	４　裁判所書記官は、第一項の否認の登記がされている場合において、更生会社について、更生計画認可の決定が確定したときは、職権で、遅滞なく、当該否認の登記の抹消を嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(4) If a registration of avoidance set forth in paragraph (1) is made, if, with regard to the reorganizing company, an order of confirmation of the reorganization plan becomes final and binding, a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission cancellation of the registration of avoidance.

ja-jp	５　前項に規定する場合において、裁判所書記官から当該否認の登記の抹消の嘱託を受けたときは、登記官は、職権で、第二項第二号及び第三号に掲げる登記を抹消しなければならない。この場合において、否認された行為の後否認の登記がされるまでの間に、同項第二号に掲げる登記に係る権利を目的とする第三者の権利に関する登記がされているときは、登記官は、職権で、同項第二号及び第三号に掲げる登記の抹消に代えて、同項第二号に掲げる登記に係る権利の更生会社への移転の登記をしなければならない。
en-us	(5) In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, a registrar, when commissioned by a court clerk to cancel the registration of avoidance, must cancel the registration listed in paragraph (2), item (ii) and item (iii) by their own authority. In this case, during the period between an avoided act being conducted and registration of avoidance, if a registration of a third party's right, the subject matter of which is the right pertaining to the registration set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph is made, a registrar, by their own authority, must make a registration of the transfer of the right pertaining to the registration set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph to the reorganizing company, instead of canceling the registration listed in item (ii) and item (iii) of the same paragraph.

ja-jp	６　裁判所書記官は、第一項の否認の登記がされている場合において、更生会社について、第二百三十四条第二号若しくは第三号に掲げる事由が生じ、又は第二百三十六条若しくは第二百三十七条第一項の規定による更生手続廃止の決定が確定したときは、職権で、遅滞なく、当該否認の登記の抹消を嘱託しなければならない。
en-us	(6) If a registration of avoidance set forth in paragraph (1) is made, if, with regard to the reorganizing company, the grounds listed in Article 234, item (ii) or item (iii) occur or an order of discontinuance of reorganization under the provisions of Article 236 or Article 237, paragraph (1) becomes final and binding, a court clerk, by their own authority, without delay, must commission cancellation of the registration of avoidance.

ja-jp	（登記嘱託書等の添付書面等）
en-us	(Documents to Be Attached to Written Commissions)

ja-jp	第二百六十三条　この法律の規定による登記の嘱託情報若しくは申請情報と併せて提供することが必要な情報又は嘱託書若しくは申請書に添付すべき書面その他のものは、政令で定める。
en-us	Article 263 The necessary information to be provided along with the commission information or application information regarding registrations under the provisions of this Act or the documents and other objects that should be attached to written commissions or written applications will be prescribed by Cabinet Order.

ja-jp	（登録免許税の特例）
en-us	(Special Provisions for Registration and License Tax)

ja-jp	第二百六十四条　第二百五十八条から第二百六十条まで及び第二百六十二条の規定による登記については、登録免許税を課さない。
en-us	Article 264 (1) Registration and license tax is not imposed on the registrations under the provisions of Article 258 through Article 260 and Article 262.

ja-jp	２　更生計画において更生会社が株式を発行することを定めた場合（次項、第五項及び第六項に該当する場合を除く。）における資本金の増加の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法（昭和四十二年法律第三十五号）第九条の規定にかかわらず、千分の一（増加した資本金の額のうち、更生債権者等又は株主に対し新たに払込み又は給付をさせないで株式を発行する部分に相当する金額以外の金額に対応する部分については、千分の三・五）とする。
en-us	(2) The rates for registration and license taxes when registering an increase of stated capital when a reorganization plan determines that the reorganizing company will issue shares (excluding cases that fall under the following paragraph, paragraph (5), and paragraph (6)) is 1/1000 (or 3.5/1000 for the section of stated increase in capital separate from the amount equivalent to that derived by issuing shares to reorganization creditors for which they make further payment or performance for), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 of the Registration and License Tax Act (Act No. 35 of 1967).

ja-jp	３　更生計画において更生会社が株式交換をすることを定めた場合における株式交換による資本金の増加の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法第九条の規定にかかわらず、千分の一（株式交換により増加した資本金の額のうち、更生債権者等又は株主に株式又は持分を交付する部分に相当する金額以外の金額に対応する部分については、千分の三・五）とする。
en-us	(3) The rates for registration and license taxes when registering an increase of stated capital through a share exchange, when a reorganization plan determines that the reorganizing company will effect a share exchange is 1/1000 (or 3.5/1000 for the section of stated increase in capital through the share exchange separate from the amount equivalent to that derived by issuing shares or equity interest to reorganization creditors), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 of the Registration and License Tax Act.

ja-jp	４　更生計画において更生会社が株式移転をすることを定めた場合における当該株式移転による株式会社の設立の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法第九条の規定にかかわらず、千分の一（資本金の額のうち、更生債権者等又は株主に株式を交付する部分に相当する金額以外の金額に対応する部分については、千分の三・五）とする。
en-us	(4) The rates for registration and license taxes when registering the incorporation of a stock company through a share transfer, when a reorganization plan determines that the reorganizing company will effect a share transfer is 1/1000 (or 3.5/1000 for the section of stated capital separate from the amount equivalent to that derived by delivering shares to reorganization creditors or shareholders), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 of the Registration and License Tax Act.

ja-jp	５　更生計画において更生会社が会社の分割をすることを定めた場合における当該新設分割又は吸収分割による株式会社若しくは合同会社の設立又は資本金の増加の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法第九条の規定にかかわらず、千分の一（それぞれ資本金の額又は吸収分割により増加した資本金の額のうち、同法別表第一第二十四号（一）ト又はチの税率欄に規定する部分に相当する金額に対応する部分については、千分の三・五）とする。
en-us	(5) The rates for registration and license taxes applied to registration of the incorporation of a stock company or limited liability company, or of the increase of stated capital through an incorporation-type company split or absorption-type company split, when a Reorganization Plan determines that the Reorganization Company will effect a company split, is 1/1000 (or 3.5/1000 for the section of stated capital or the amount of increase of stated capital through the absorption-type company split, which is equivalent to the part prescribed in Appended Table 1 of the Act, item (xxiv)-(1)(g) or (h) in the tax rate column), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 of the Registration and License Tax Act.

ja-jp	６　更生計画において更生会社が新設合併若しくは吸収合併又は組織変更をすることを定めた場合における当該新設合併若しくは組織変更による株式会社若しくは合同会社の設立又は吸収合併による資本金の増加の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法第九条の規定にかかわらず、千分の一（それぞれ資本金の額又は吸収合併により増加した資本金の額のうち、同法別表第一第二十四号（一）ホ又はヘの税率欄に規定する部分に相当する金額（更生債権者等に株式又は持分を交付する部分に相当する金額を除く。）に対応する部分については、千分の三・五）とする。
en-us	(6) The rates for registration and license taxes applied to registration of the incorporation of a stock company or limited liability company, through a consolidation-type merger or entity conversion or of the increase of stated capital through an absorption-type merger, when a reorganization plan determines that the reorganizing company will effect a consolidation-type merger or absorption-type merger or entity conversion, is 1/1000 (or 3.5/1000 for the section of stated capital or the amount of increase of stated capital through the absorption-type merger, which is equivalent to the part prescribed in Appended Table 1 of the same Act, item (xxiv)-(1)(e) or (f) in the tax rate column (excluding the amount equivalent to that derived by issuing shares or equity interests to reorganization creditors)).

ja-jp	７　更生計画の定めに基づき第二百二十五条第一項に規定する新会社を設立することを定めた場合における新会社の設立の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法第九条の規定にかかわらず、千分の一（資本金の額のうち、更生債権者等又は株主に対し新たに払込み又は給付をさせないで株式を発行する部分に相当する金額以外の金額に対応する部分については、千分の三・五）とする。
en-us	(7) The rates for registration and license taxes when registering the incorporation of a new company, when a reorganization plan determines that the new company prescribed in Article 225, paragraph (1) will be incorporated, is 1/1000 (or 3.5/1000 for the section of stated capital separate from the amount equivalent to that derived by issuing shares to reorganization creditors or shareholders), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 of the Registration and License Tax Act.

ja-jp	８　更生計画において当該更生計画の定めに基づき設立された株式会社が更生会社から不動産又は船舶に関する権利の移転又は設定を受けることを定めた場合におけるその移転又は設定の登記の登録免許税の税率は、登録免許税法第九条及び租税特別措置法（昭和三十二年法律第二十六号）第七十二条の規定にかかわらず、不動産に関する権利に係る登記にあっては千分の一・五（登録免許税法別表第一第一号（五）から（七）までに掲げる登記にあっては、千分の四）とし、船舶に関する権利に係る登記にあっては千分の四とする。ただし、これらの登記につきこれらの税率を適用して計算した登録免許税の額がこれらの規定を適用して計算した登録免許税の額を超えるときは、この限りでない。
en-us	(8) If a reorganization plan determines that a stock company incorporated based on its provisions will receive the transfer or establishment of any right relating to real assets or a vessel from the reorganization company, ,the rates for registration and license taxes when registering a transfer or establishment of the right is 1.5/1000 in the case of registration of a right relating to real assets (or 4/1000 in the case of any of the registrations listed in Appended Table 1 of the Registration and License Tax Act, item (i)-(5) to (7)), or 4/1000 in the case of registration of a right relating to a vessel; provided, however, that this does not apply if the amount of registration and license taxes calculated by applying this rate to the respective registrations exceeds the amount of registration and license tax calculated by applying the provisions (notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 of the Registration and License Tax Act and Article 72 of the Act of Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Act No. 26 of 1957)).

ja-jp	第二百六十五条　第二百六十条、第二百六十一条第六項、第二百六十二条、第二百六十三条及び前条第一項の規定は、登録のある権利について準用する。
en-us	Article 265 The provisions of Article 260, Article 261, paragraph (6), Article 262, Article 263, and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to registered rights.

ja-jp	第十三章　罰則
en-us	Chapter XIII Penal Provisions

ja-jp	（詐欺更生罪）
en-us	(Crime of Fraudulent Reorganization)

ja-jp	第二百六十六条　更生手続開始の前後を問わず、債権者、担保権者（株式会社の財産につき特別の先取特権、質権、抵当権又は商法若しくは会社法の規定による留置権を有する者をいう。以下この章において同じ。）又は株主を害する目的で、次の各号のいずれかに該当する行為をした者は、株式会社について更生手続開始の決定が確定したときは、十年以下の懲役若しくは千万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。情を知って、第四号に掲げる行為の相手方となった者も、更生手続開始の決定が確定したときは、同様とする。
en-us	Article 266 (1) A person that, before or after the commencement of reorganization, for the purpose of harming creditors, security right holders (meaning holders of a special statutory lien, pledge, mortgage, or right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act; hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter) or shareholders, has conducted any of the acts listed in the following items is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than ten years or a fine of not more than ten million yen, or both, when an order commencing reorganization against the stock company becomes final and binding. The same applies to a person that has served as the other party to the act set forth in item (iv) while knowing the purpose, when an order commencing reorganization becomes final and binding:

ja-jp	一　株式会社の財産を隠匿し、又は損壊する行為
en-us	(i) an act of concealing or damaging the stock company's assets;

ja-jp	二　株式会社の財産の譲渡又は債務の負担を仮装する行為
en-us	(ii) an act of faking the transfer of the stock company's assets or assumption of debts;

ja-jp	三　株式会社の財産の現状を改変して、その価格を減損する行為
en-us	(iii) an act of altering the existing status of the stock company's assets, thereby reducing its value; or

ja-jp	四　株式会社の財産を債権者、担保権者若しくは株主の不利益に処分し、又は債権者、担保権者若しくは株主に不利益な債務を株式会社が負担する行為
en-us	(iv) an act of disposing of the stock company's assets in a manner disadvantageous to creditors, security right holders or shareholders, or an act, committed by the stock company, of assuming debts disadvantageous to creditors, security right holders or shareholders.

ja-jp	２　前項に規定するもののほか、株式会社について更生手続開始の決定がされ、又は保全管理命令が発せられたことを認識しながら、債権者、担保権者又は株主を害する目的で、管財人の承諾その他の正当な理由がなく、その株式会社の財産を取得し、又は第三者に取得させた者も、同項と同様とする。
en-us	(2) Beyond what is prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the same paragraph also applies to a person that, knowing that an order commencing reorganization is made or an order for temporary administration is issued against a stock company, for the purpose of harming creditors, security right holders or shareholders, has acquired the stock company's assets or has had a third party acquire it, without consent of a trustee or any other justifiable grounds.

ja-jp	（特定の債権者等に対する担保の供与等の罪）
en-us	(Crime of Providing Security to a Specific Creditor)

ja-jp	第二百六十七条　株式会社の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者が、更生手続開始の前後を問わず、その株式会社の業務に関し、特定の債権者又は担保権者に対するその株式会社の債務について、他の債権者又は担保権者を害する目的で、担保の供与又は債務の消滅に関する行為であってその株式会社の義務に属せず又はその方法若しくは時期がその株式会社の義務に属しないものをし、株式会社について更生手続開始の決定が確定したときは、五年以下の懲役若しくは五百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 267 If a representative person, agent, employee, or other worker of a stock company, before or after the commencement of reorganization, in connection with the stock company's business, with regard to the stock company's debt to a specific creditor or security right holder, for the purpose of harming other creditors or security right holder, has conducted an act concerning the provision of security or extinguishment of debt that is not included in the scope of the stock company's obligation in terms of the act itself or the means or time of performance of the act, and an order commencing reorganization has become final and binding, the person is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than five million yen, or both.

ja-jp	（管財人等の特別背任罪）
en-us	(Crime of a Special Breach of Trust by a Trustee)

ja-jp	第二百六十八条　管財人、管財人代理、保全管理人、保全管理人代理、監督委員又は調査委員が、自己若しくは第三者の利益を図り又は債権者、担保権者若しくは株主に損害を加える目的で、その任務に背く行為をし、債権者、担保権者又は株主に財産上の損害を加えたときは、十年以下の懲役若しくは千万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 268 (1) If a trustee, trustee representative, provisional administrator, provisional administrator representative, supervisor, or examiner, for the purpose of promoting their own interest or the interest of a third party, or inflicting damage on creditors, security right holders, or shareholders, has committed an act in breach of their duty and caused financial loss to creditors, security right holders or shareholders, the person is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than ten years or a fine of not more than ten million yen, or both.

ja-jp	２　管財人、保全管理人、監督委員又は調査委員（以下この項において「管財人等」という。）が法人であるときは、前項の規定は、管財人等の職務を行う役員又は職員に適用する。
en-us	(2) If a trustee, provisional administrator, supervisor, or examiner (hereinafter referred to as a "trustee, etc." in this paragraph) is a corporation, the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply to the officer or employee who performs the duties of a trustee, etc.

ja-jp	（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪）
en-us	(Crime of Refusal of Reports and Inspections)

ja-jp	第二百六十九条　第七十七条第一項又は第二百九条第三項に規定する者が第七十七条第一項（第三十四条第一項、第三十八条又は第百二十六条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二百九条第三項の規定による報告を拒み、又は虚偽の報告をしたときは、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 269 (1) If any of the persons prescribed in Article 77, paragraph (1) or Article 209, paragraph (3) has refused to make a report under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34, paragraph (1), Article 38, or Article 126) or Article 209, paragraph (3) or made a false report, the person is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than three million yen, or both

ja-jp	２　第七十七条第一項又は第二百九条第三項に規定する者の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者（第四項において「代表者等」という。）が、第七十七条第一項又は第二百九条第三項に規定する者の業務に関し、第七十七条第一項（第三十四条第一項、第三十八条又は第百二十六条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二百九条第三項の規定による報告を拒み、又は虚偽の報告をしたときも、前項と同様とする。
en-us	(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph also apply when a representative, agent, employee, or other worker (hereinafter referred to as a "representative, etc." in paragraph (4)) of any of the persons prescribed in Article 77, paragraph (1) or Article 209, paragraph (3), in connection with the business of a person prescribed in Article 77, paragraph (1) or Article 209, paragraph (3), has refused to make a report under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34, paragraph (1), Article 38 or Article 126) or Article 209, paragraph (3) or made a false report.

ja-jp	３　第七十七条第一項に規定する者（同項に規定するこれらの者であった者を除く。）又は第二百九条第三項に規定する者（同項に規定するこれらの者であった者を除く。）が、その更生会社の業務に関し、第七十七条第一項（第三十四条第一項、第三十八条又は第百二十六条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二百九条第三項の規定による検査を拒んだときも、第一項と同様とする。
en-us	(3) The provisions of paragraph (1) also apply when any of the persons prescribed in Article 77, paragraph (1) (excluding persons that held those posts prescribed in the same paragraph) or Article 209, paragraph (3) (excluding persons that held those posts prescribed in the same paragraph), in connection with the reorganizing company's business, has refused an inspection under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) (including cases when applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34, paragraph (1), Article 38 or Article 126) or Article 209, paragraph (3).

ja-jp	４　第七十七条第二項に規定する更生会社の子会社の代表者等が、その更生会社の子会社の業務に関し、同項（第三十四条第一項、第三十八条又は第百二十六条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による報告若しくは検査を拒み、又は虚偽の報告をしたときも、第一項と同様とする。
en-us	(4) The provisions of paragraph (1) also apply when a representative, etc. of the reorganizing company's subsidiary company prescribed in Article 77, paragraph (2), in connection with the business of the reorganizing company's subsidiary company, has refused to make a report or refused an inspection under the provisions of the same paragraph (including cases when applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34, paragraph (1), Article 38 or Article 126) or made a false report.

ja-jp	（業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪）
en-us	(Crime of Spoliation of Objects Concerning the Status of Business and Property)

ja-jp	第二百七十条　更生手続開始の前後を問わず、債権者、担保権者又は株主を害する目的で、株式会社の業務及び財産の状況に関する帳簿、書類その他の物件を隠滅し、偽造し、又は変造した者は、株式会社について更生手続開始の決定が確定したときは、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 270 A person that, before or after the commencement of reorganization, for the purpose of harming creditors, security right holders or shareholders, has spoliated, forged, or altered books, documents or any other objects concerning the status of a stock company's business and assets is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than three million yen, or both, when an order commencing reorganization against the stock company becomes final and binding.

ja-jp	（管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）
en-us	(Crime of Obstruction of Duties against a Trustee)

ja-jp	第二百七十一条　偽計又は威力を用いて、管財人、管財人代理、保全管理人、保全管理人代理、監督委員又は調査委員の職務を妨害した者は、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 271 A person that, by the use of fraudulent means or force, has obstructed the performance of duties of a trustee, trustee representative, provisional administrator, provisional administrator representative, supervisor, or examiner is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than three million yen, or both.

ja-jp	第二百七十二条　管財人、管財人代理、保全管理人、保全管理人代理、監督委員、調査委員又は法律顧問が、その職務に関し、賄賂を収受し、又はその要求若しくは約束をしたときは、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 272 (1) If a trustee, trustee representative, provisional administrator, provisional administrator representative, supervisor, examiner, or legal advisor, in connection with their duties, has accepted, solicited or promised to accept a bribe, they are subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than three million yen, or both.

ja-jp	２　前項の場合において、その管財人、管財人代理、保全管理人、保全管理人代理、監督委員、調査委員又は法律顧問が不正の請託を受けたときは、五年以下の懲役若しくは五百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	(2) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, when the trustee, trustee representative, provisional administrator, provisional administrator representative, supervisor, examiner, or legal advisor accedes to an unlawful request, they are subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than five million yen, or both.

ja-jp	３　管財人、保全管理人、監督委員又は調査委員（以下この条において「管財人等」という。）が法人である場合において、管財人等の職務を行うその役員又は職員が、その管財人等の職務に関し、賄賂を収受し、又はその要求若しくは約束をしたときは、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。管財人等が法人である場合において、その役員又は職員が、その管財人等の職務に関し、管財人等に賄賂を収受させ、又はその供与の要求若しくは約束をしたときも、同様とする。
en-us	(3) If a trustee, provisional administrator, supervisor, or examiner (hereinafter referred to as a "trustee, etc." in this Article) is a corporation, if its officer or employee who performs the duties of a trustee, etc. has accepted, solicited or promised to accept a bribe, they are subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than three million yen, or both. The same applies when a trustee, etc. is a corporation, and its officer or official, in connection with the duties of a trustee, etc., has caused the trustee, etc. to accept a bribe, or solicit or promise to accept a bribe.

ja-jp	４　前項の場合において、その役員又は職員が不正の請託を受けたときは、五年以下の懲役若しくは五百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	(4) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, when the officer or employee has acceded to an unlawful request, they are subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than five million yen, or both.

ja-jp	５　更生債権者等、株主若しくは代理委員又はこれらの者の代理人、役員若しくは職員が、関係人集会の期日における議決権の行使又は第百八十九条第二項第二号に規定する書面等投票による議決権の行使に関し、不正の請託を受けて、賄賂を収受し、又はその要求若しくは約束をしたときは、五年以下の懲役若しくは五百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	(5) If a reorganization creditor, etc., shareholder, or representative or an agent, officer, or employee thereof has accepted a bribe in response to an unlawful request to exercise a voting right on the date of a stakeholders meeting, or vote in writing, as prescribed in Article 189, paragraph (2), item (ii), or solicited or agreed to such a bribe, they are subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than five million yen, or both.

ja-jp	６　前各項の場合において、犯人又は法人である管財人等が収受した賄賂は、没収する。その全部又は一部を没収することができないときは、その価額を追徴する。
en-us	(6) In the cases referred to in the preceding paragraphs, a bribe accepted by the offender or by the trustee, etc. that is a corporation, is subject to confiscation. When the whole or part of the bribe cannot be confiscated, an equivalent value thereof will be collected.

ja-jp	第二百七十三条　前条第一項又は第三項に規定する賄賂を供与し、又はその申込み若しくは約束をした者は、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	Article 273 (1) A person that has given, offered or promised to offer a bribe prescribed in paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than three million yen, or both.

ja-jp	２　前条第二項、第四項又は第五項に規定する賄賂を供与し、又はその申込み若しくは約束をした者は、五年以下の懲役若しくは五百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
en-us	(2) A person that has given, offered or promised to offer a bribe prescribed in paragraph (2), paragraph (4) or paragraph (5) of the preceding Article is subject to punishment by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than five million yen, or both.

ja-jp	第二百七十四条　第二百六十六条、第二百六十七条、第二百七十条、第二百七十一条及び前条の罪は、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二条の例に従う。
en-us	Article 274 (1) The crimes set forth in Article 266, Article 267, Article 270, Article 271, and the preceding Article will be governed by the provisions of Article 2 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907).

ja-jp	２　第二百六十八条及び第二百七十二条（第五項を除く。）の罪は、刑法第四条の例に従う。
en-us	(2) The crimes set forth in Article 268 and Article 272 (excluding paragraph (5)) will be governed by the provisions of Article 4 of the Penal Code.

ja-jp	３　第二百七十二条第五項の罪は、日本国外において同項の罪を犯した者にも適用する。
en-us	(3) The crime set forth in Article 272, paragraph (5) also applies to a person that has committed the crime set forth in the same paragraph outside Japan.

ja-jp	第二百七十五条　法人の代表者又は法人若しくは人の代理人、使用人その他の従業者が、その法人又は人の業務又は財産に関し、第二百六十六条、第二百六十七条、第二百六十九条（第一項を除く。）、第二百七十条、第二百七十一条又は第二百七十三条の違反行為をしたときは、行為者を罰するほか、その法人又は人に対しても、各本条の罰金刑を科する。
en-us	Article 275 When the representative of a corporation, or an agent, employee, or any other worker of a corporation or individual, in connection with the business or assets of the corporation or individual, has committed violation of Article 266, Article 267, Article 269 (excluding paragraph(1)), Article 270, Article 271, or Article 273, not only the offender, but also the corporation or individual is subject to punishment by a fine prescribed in the respective Articles.

ja-jp	第二百七十六条　更生会社又は更生会社の事業の更生のために債務を負担し、若しくは担保を提供する者は、第二百九条第四項の規定による裁判所の命令に違反した場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。
en-us	Article 276 When the reorganizing company or a person that owes a debt or provides security for the purpose of reorganization of the reorganizing company's business has violated an order issued by the court under the provisions of Article 209, paragraph (4), the company or the person is subject to punishment by a non-criminal fine of not more than one million yen.

ja-jp	附　則
en-us	Supplementary Provisions

ja-jp	第一条　この法律は、公布の日から起算して六月を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日から施行する。
en-us	Article 1 This Act comes into effect as of the day specified by Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding six months from the date of promulgation.

ja-jp	（更生事件に関する経過措置）
en-us	(Transitional Measures Concerning Reorganization Cases)

ja-jp	第二条　この法律の施行前にされた更生手続開始の申立てに係る株式会社の更生事件については、なお従前の例による。
en-us	Article 2 Prior laws continue to govern stock company reorganization cases based on petitions to commence reorganization filed before this Act comes into effect.

ja-jp	（罰則の適用に関する経過措置）
en-us	(Transitional Measures Concerning the Application of Penal Provisions)

ja-jp	第三条　この法律の施行前にした行為及び前条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる場合におけるこの法律の施行後にした行為に対する罰則の適用については、なお従前の例による。
en-us	Article 3 The prior laws continue to govern the applicability of penal provisions to conduct that a person engages in before this Act, is to continue to be governed by prior laws.