第一条行政不服審査法施行令（以下「令」という。）第八条（令第十八条及び第十九条第一項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）に規定する方法によって口頭意見陳述の期日における審理を行う場合には、審理関係人（行政不服審査法（平成二十六年法律第六十八号。以下「法」という。）第九条第三項に規定する場合において処分庁等が審査庁であるときにあっては審査請求人及び参加人、再調査の請求にあっては再調査の請求人及び参加人。以下この条において同じ。）の意見を聴いて、当該審理に必要な装置が設置された場所であって審理員（法第九条第三項に規定する場合にあっては審査庁、再調査の請求にあっては処分庁、再審査庁が法第六十六条第一項において準用する法第九条第一項各号に掲げる機関である場合にあっては再審査庁）が相当と認める場所を、審理関係人ごとに指定して行う。

Article 1When conducting proceedings on the date of an oral opinion statement by the means prescribed in Article 8 of the Order for Enforcement of the Administrative Complaint Review Act (referred to as "the Order" below ) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18 and Article 19, paragraph (1) of the Order following the deemed replacement of terms), the proceedings are to be conducted by hearing the opinions of the persons concerned with proceedings (when the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition is the reviewing agency in the case prescribed in Article 9, paragraph (3) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act (Act No. 68 of 2014; referred to as "the Act" below), the requestor for review and the intervenors, and for a request for re-investigation, the requestor for re-investigation and the intervenors; the same applies below in this Article) and by designating a place where necessary equipment for the proceedings has been installed and a place that the review officer (the reviewing agency in the case prescribed in Article 9, paragraph (3) of the Act, the administrative agency reaching the disposition in the case of a request for re-investigation, or the re-examining agency when the re-examining agency is any of the agencies stated in the items of Article 9, paragraph (1) of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, paragraph (1) of the Act) finds appropriate for each person concerned with proceedings.

第二条削除

Article 2Deleted

第三条令第十四条第一項（令第十九条第一項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）に規定する総務省令で定める方法は、次に掲げる方法とする。

Article 3The method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications prescribed in Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Order (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19, paragraph (1) of the Order following the deemed replacement of terms) is to be either of the following methods:

第四条令第十六条（令第十九条第一項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）に規定する総務省令で定める書類は、次に掲げるもの（電磁的記録を含み、事件記録に該当するものを除く。）とする。

Article 4The documents specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as prescribed in Article 16 of the Order (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19, paragraph (1) of the Order following the deemed replacement of terms) are as follows (including electronic or magnetic records and excluding those falling under case records):

第五条第一条の規定は法第七十五条第一項の規定による意見の陳述について、第三条の規定は法第七十八条第一項の規定による交付について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、次の表の上欄に掲げる規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句に読み替えるものとする。

Article 5The provisions of Article 1 apply mutatis mutandis to the statement of opinions under the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (1) of the Act, and the provisions of Article 3 apply mutatis mutandis to the delivery under the provisions of Article 78, paragraph (1) of the Act. In such a case, the terms stated in the middle column of the following Appended Table provided in the provisions stated in the left-hand column of that Table are deemed to be replaced with the terms stated in the right-hand column of that Table.