第八条景観行政団体は、都市、農山漁村その他市街地又は集落を形成している地域及びこれと一体となって景観を形成している地域における次の各号のいずれかに該当する土地（水面を含む。以下この項、第十一条及び第十四条第二項において同じ。）の区域について、良好な景観の形成に関する計画（以下「景観計画」という。）を定めることができる。

Article 8(1)A Landscape Administration Body may formulate a plan for the formation of a good landscape (hereinafter referred to as a "Landscape Plan") for an area of land (including water surface; the same shall apply in the rest of this paragraph, Article 11, and Article 14, paragraph (2)) that falls under any of the categories listed below in an urban city, rural town, or other populated area or settlement, and in any area that integrally forms a landscape together with these:

２景観計画においては、次に掲げる事項を定めるものとする。

(2)A Landscape Plan must specify the following:

３前項各号に掲げるもののほか、景観計画においては、景観計画区域における良好な景観の形成に関する方針を定めるよう努めるものとする。

(3)In addition to what is listed in each item of the preceding paragraph, a Landscape Administration Body shall endeavor to formulate policies concerning the formation of a good landscape in the relevant Landscape Planning Area.

４第二項第二号の行為の制限に関する事項には、政令で定める基準に従い、次に掲げるものを定めなければならない。

(4)Among the matters related to restrictions on actions which are referred to in paragraph (2), item (ii), the following must be specified in accordance with the criteria prescribed by Cabinet Order:

５景観計画は、国土形成計画、首都圏整備計画、近畿圏整備計画、中部圏開発整備計画、北海道総合開発計画、沖縄振興計画その他の国土計画又は地方計画に関する法律に基づく計画及び道路、河川、鉄道、港湾、空港等の施設に関する国の計画との調和が保たれるものでなければならない。

(5)A Landscape Plan must be consistent with all plans formulated pursuant to Acts on national land plans or regional plans, including but not limited to the National Spatial Plan, National Central Region Development Plan, Kinki Region Development Plan, Chubu Region Development Plan, Hokkaido Comprehensive Development Plan, Okinawa Promotion Plan, as well as with all national plans for facilities such as roads, rivers, railways, ports, and airports.

６景観計画は、環境基本法（平成五年法律第九十一号）第十五条第一項に規定する環境基本計画（当該景観計画区域について公害防止計画が定められているときは、当該公害防止計画を含む。）との調和が保たれるものでなければならない。

(6)A Landscape Plan must be consistent with the Basic Environment Plan (including the pollution prevention plan for the relevant Landscape Planning Area if such a plan has been formulated) prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (1) of the Environment Basic Act (Act No. 91 of 1993).

７都市計画区域について定める景観計画は、都市計画法第六条の二第一項の都市計画区域の整備、開発及び保全の方針に適合するものでなければならない。

(7)A Landscape Plan formulated for a City Planning Area must comply with the policy for the improvement, development, and preservation of the City Planning Area as prescribed in Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the City Planning Act.

８市町村である景観行政団体が定める景観計画は、議会の議決を経て定められた当該市町村の建設に関する基本構想に即するとともに、都市計画区域又は準都市計画区域について定めるものにあっては、都市計画法第十八条の二第一項の市町村の都市計画に関する基本的な方針に適合するものでなければならない。

(8)A Landscape Plan formulated by a municipality acting as a Landscape Administration Body must conform to the municipality's basic scheme for construction established by resolution of the assembly thereof, and a Landscape Plan formulated for a City Planning Area or a Quasi-City Planning Area must conform to the basic policy under the city plan of the municipality as referred to in Article 18-2, paragraph (1) of the City Planning Act.

９景観計画に定める第二項第四号ロ及びハに掲げる事項は、景観重要公共施設の種類に応じて、政令で定める公共施設の整備又は管理に関する方針又は計画に適合するものでなければならない。

(9)The matters listed in paragraph (2), item (iv), (b) and (c) which are specified in a Landscape Plan must conform to the policies or plans for the development or management of public facilities prescribed by Cabinet Order, for the relevant type of public facilities of landscape importance.

１０第二項第四号ニに掲げる事項を定める景観計画は、同項第一号及び第四号ニに掲げる事項並びに第三項に規定する事項については、農業振興地域の整備に関する法律（昭和四十四年法律第五十八号）第四条第一項の農業振興地域整備基本方針に適合するとともに、市町村である景観行政団体が定めるものにあっては、農業振興地域整備計画（同法第八条第一項の規定により定められた農業振興地域整備計画をいう。以下同じ。）に適合するものでなければならない。

(10)In a Landscape Plan that specifies the matters listed in paragraph (2), item (iv), (d), the matters listed in item (i) and item (iv), (d) of the paragraph, and the matters prescrived inparagraph (3) must conform to the basic policy for the development of the agricultural promotion area prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1), of the Act on the Development of Agricultural Promotion Areas (Act No. 58 of 1969), and a Landscape Plan formulated by a municipality acting as a Landscape Administration Body must conform to the agricultural promotion area development plan (an agricultural promotion area development plan formulated pursuant to the provision of Article 8, paragraph (1), of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter).

１１景観計画に定める第二項第四号ホに掲げる事項は、自然公園法第二条第五号に規定する公園計画に適合するものでなければならない。

(11)The matters listed in paragraph (2), item (iv), (e) which are specified in a Landscape Plan must conform to the park plan as prescribed in Article 2, item (v), of the Natural Parks Act.

第九条景観行政団体は、景観計画を定めようとするときは、あらかじめ、公聴会の開催等住民の意見を反映させるために必要な措置を講ずるものとする。

Article 9(1)Before seeking to formulate a Landscape Plan, a Landscape Administration Body shall take measures necessary for reflecting the opinions of local residents, such as holding a public hearing.

２景観行政団体は、景観計画を定めようとするときは、都市計画区域又は準都市計画区域に係る部分について、あらかじめ、都道府県都市計画審議会（市町村である景観行政団体に市町村都市計画審議会が置かれているときは、当該市町村都市計画審議会）の意見を聴かなければならない。

(2)Before seeking to formulate a Landscape Plan, a Landscape Administration Body shall hear the opinions of the relevant prefectural city planning council (or the relevant municipal city planning council, if any) with respect to any part of the plan related to the relevant City Planning Area or Quasi-City Planning Area.

３都道府県である景観行政団体は、景観計画を定めようとするときは、あらかじめ、関係市町村の意見を聴かなければならない。

(3)Before seeking to formulate a Landscape Plan, a prefecture acting as a Landscape Administration Body shall hear the opinions of the municipality in question.

４景観行政団体は、景観計画に前条第二項第四号ロ又はハに掲げる事項を定めようとするときは、あらかじめ、当該事項について、国土交通省令・農林水産省令・環境省令で定めるところにより、当該景観重要公共施設の管理者（景観行政団体であるものを除く。）に協議し、その同意を得なければならない。

(4)Before seeking to specify any of the matters listed in paragraph (2), item (iv), (b) and (c), of the preceding Article in a Landscape Plan, a Landscape Administration Body shall consult with the manager (excluding a Landscape Administration Body) of the relevant Public Facility of Landscape Importance pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, or the Ministry of the Environment, and must obtain the manager's consent therefor.

５景観行政団体は、景観計画に前条第二項第五号ホに掲げる事項を定めようとするときは、あらかじめ、当該事項について、国立公園等管理者（国立公園にあっては環境大臣、国定公園にあっては都道府県知事をいう。以下同じ。）に協議し、その同意を得なければならない。

(5)Before seeking to specify any of the matters listed in paragraph (2), item (v), (e), of the preceding Article in a Landscape Plan, the Landscape Administration Body shall consult with the manager of the relevant National Park or Quasi-National Park (meaning the Minister of the Environment for a National Park, or the prefectural governor for a Quasi-National Park; the same shall apply hereinafter) with respect to the matters, and must obtain the manager's consent therefor.

６景観行政団体は、景観計画を定めたときは、その旨を告示し、国土交通省令・農林水産省令・環境省令で定めるところにより、これを当該景観行政団体の事務所において公衆の縦覧に供しなければならない。

(6)When a Landscape Administration Body has formulated a Landscape Plan, the Landscape Administration Body shall give public notice to that effect and make the plan available for public inspection at its office pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, or the Ministry of the Environment.

７前各項の規定は、景観行政団体が、景観計画を定める手続に関する事項（前各項の規定に反しないものに限る。）について、条例で必要な規定を定めることを妨げるものではない。

(7)The provisions of each of the preceding paragraphs do not preclude the Landscape Administration Body from stipulating, by Ordinance, any necessary provisions on the matters involved in the Landscape Plan formulation process (limited to those not violating the provisions of each of the preceding paragraphs).

８前各項の規定は、景観計画の変更について準用する。

(8)The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to any change in a Landscape Plan.

第十条特定公共施設の管理者は、景観計画を策定し、又は策定しようとする景観行政団体に対し、当該景観計画に係る景観計画区域（景観計画を策定しようとする景観行政団体に対しては、当該景観行政団体が策定しようとする景観計画に係る景観計画区域となるべき区域）内の当該管理者の管理に係る特定公共施設について、これを景観重要公共施設として当該景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ロ又はハに掲げる事項を定めるべきことを要請することができる。この場合においては、当該要請に係る景観計画の部分の素案を添えなければならない。

Article 10(1)The manager of a Specified Public Facility may request a Landscape Administration Body that is formulating or seeking to formulate a Landscape Plan, to specify the matters listed in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (b) or (c) for a Specified Public Facility under the manager's management and within the Landscape Planning Area under the Landscape Administration Body's Landscape Plan (or an area that will become a Landscape Planning Area under the Landscape Plan that the Landscape Administration Body seeks to formulate),with such Specified Public Facility as a Public Facility of Landscape Importance in the Landscape Plan.In this case, an indicative draft of the part of the Landscape Plan related to the request must accompany the request.

２景観計画に定められた景観重要公共施設の管理者は、景観行政団体に対し、当該景観計画について、第八条第二項第四号ロ又はハに掲げる事項の追加又は変更を要請することができる。前項後段の規定は、この場合について準用する。

(2)The manager of a Public Facility of Landscape Importance specified in a Landscape Plan may request the relevant Landscape Administration Body to add or modify a matter listed in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (b) or (c) in the Landscape Plan. In this case, the provisions of the second sentence of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis.

３景観行政団体は、前二項の要請があった場合には、これを尊重しなければならない。

(3)If the Landscape Administration Body has received a request referred to in either of the preceding two paragraphs, it must respect this.

第十一条第八条第一項に規定する土地の区域のうち、一体として良好な景観を形成すべき土地の区域としてふさわしい一団の土地の区域であって政令で定める規模以上のものについて、当該土地の所有権又は建物の所有を目的とする対抗要件を備えた地上権若しくは賃借権（臨時設備その他一時使用のために設定されたことが明らかなものを除く。以下「借地権」という。）を有する者（以下この条において「土地所有者等」という。）は、一人で、又は数人が共同して、景観行政団体に対し、景観計画の策定又は変更を提案することができる。この場合においては、当該提案に係る景観計画の素案を添えなければならない。

Article 11(1)A person who holds a right of ownership in land or a perfected right of superficies or land lease right for the purpose of possession of a building (excluding any right that has clearly been established for temporary use, such as a right to the use of temporary facilities; hereinafter referred as a "Land Lease Right") (hereinafter in this Article such person is referred to as a "Landowner"), in an area of land as prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1), which comprises a group of lands of at least the size specified by Cabinet Order, which, as a unit, are suitable for the integrated formation of a good landscape, may singly or jointly with others propose the formulation or modification of a Landscape Plan to the relevant Landscape Administration Body.In this case, an indicative draft of the Landscape Plan in connection with the proposal must accompany the proposal.

２まちづくりの推進を図る活動を行うことを目的とする特定非営利活動促進法（平成十年法律第七号）第二条第二項の特定非営利活動法人若しくは一般社団法人若しくは一般財団法人又はこれらに準ずるものとして景観行政団体の条例で定める団体は、前項に規定する土地の区域について、景観行政団体に対し、景観計画の策定又は変更を提案することができる。同項後段の規定は、この場合について準用する。

(2)A specified nonprofit Organization as defined in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act to Promote Specified Non-profit Activities (Act No. 7 of 1998), general incorporated association, or general incorporated foundation established for the purpose of carrying out activities to promote community buildings, or an organization set forth as equivalent to the foregoing by Ordinance of a Landscape Administration Body may propose the formulation or modification of a Landscape Plan to the Landscape Administration Body for the land areas referred to in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the provisions of the second sentence of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis.

３前二項の規定による提案（以下「計画提案」という。）は、当該計画提案に係る景観計画の素案の対象となる土地（国又は地方公共団体の所有している土地で公共施設の用に供されているものを除く。以下この項において同じ。）の区域内の土地所有者等の三分の二以上の同意（同意した者が所有するその区域内の土地の地積と同意した者が有する借地権の目的となっているその区域内の土地の地積との合計が、その区域内の土地の総地積と借地権の目的となっている土地の総地積との合計の三分の二以上となる場合に限る。）を得ている場合に、国土交通省令・農林水産省令・環境省令で定めるところにより、行うものとする。

(3)A proposal under the preceding two paragraphs (hereinafter referred to as a "Planning Proposal") must be made as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, or the Ministry of the Environment if the consent of two-thirds or more (limited to when the total parcel areas (excluding any land owned by the national government or a local government that is used for a Public Facility; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) owned by the consenting persons and the total parcel areas over which the consenting persons hold Land Lease Rights add up to two-thirds or more of the total of parcel areas owned by the Landowners and parcel areas subject to Land Lease Rights within the areas concerned) of the Landowners in the areas of land covered by the draft of the Landscape Plan has been obtained.

第十二条景観行政団体は、計画提案が行われたときは、遅滞なく、当該計画提案を踏まえて景観計画の策定又は変更をする必要があるかどうかを判断し、当該景観計画の策定又は変更をする必要があると認めるときは、その案を作成しなければならない。

Article 12When a Planning Proposal has been made to a Landscape Administration Body, the Landscape Administration Body shall without delay judge whether or not the Landscape Plan needs to be formulated or modified in light of the Planning Proposal and, if the Landscape Administration Body finds it necessary to formulate or modify a Landscape Plan as proposed, the Landscape Administration Body shall draw a draft for such plan or modification.

第十三条景観行政団体は、前条の規定により計画提案を踏まえて景観計画の策定又は変更をしようとする場合において、その策定又は変更が当該計画提案に係る景観計画の素案の内容の一部を実現することとなるものであるときは、第九条第二項の規定により当該景観計画の案について意見を聴く都道府県都市計画審議会又は市町村都市計画審議会に対し、当該計画提案に係る景観計画の素案を提出しなければならない。

Article 13When a Landscape Administration Body seeks to formulate or modify a Landscape Plan in light of a Planning Proposal pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Article, if the formulation or modification of the Landscape Plan would bring into being a part of the indicative draft of the Landscape Plan based on the Planning Proposal, the Landscape Administration Body shall submit the indicative draft of the Landscape Plan based on the Planning Proposal to the Prefectural City Planning Council or Municipal City Planning Council whose opinion on the draft Landscape Plan is sought pursuant to Article 9, paragraph (2).

第十四条景観行政団体は、第十二条の規定により同条の判断をした結果、計画提案を踏まえて景観計画の策定又は変更をする必要がないと決定したときは、遅滞なく、その旨及びその理由を、当該計画提案をした者に通知しなければならない。

Article 14(1)If a Landscape Administration Body has judged pursuant to the provisions of Article 12 that it is unnecessary to formulate or modify a Landscape Plan based on a Planning Proposal, the Landscape Administration Body shall without delay notify the person who made the Planning Proposal of the judgment and the reason therefor.

２景観行政団体は、都市計画区域又は準都市計画区域内の土地について前項の通知をしようとするときは、あらかじめ、都道府県都市計画審議会（市町村である景観行政団体に市町村都市計画審議会が置かれているときは、当該市町村都市計画審議会）に当該計画提案に係る景観計画の素案を提出してその意見を聴かなければならない。

(2)Before seeking to file the notification referred to in the preceding paragraph concerning any land in a City Planning Area or Quasi-City Planning Area, a Landscape Administration Body shall submit the draft of the Landscape Plan based on the relevant Planning Proposal to the Prefectural City Planning Council (or the Municipal City Planning Council, if any, in the municipality acting as the Landscape Administration Body) and hear the opinions of the Council.

第十五条景観計画区域における良好な景観の形成を図るために必要な協議を行うため、景観行政団体、景観計画に定められた景観重要公共施設の管理者及び第九十二条第一項の規定により指定された景観整備機構（当該景観行政団体が都道府県であるときは関係市町村を、当該景観計画区域に国立公園又は国定公園の区域が含まれるときは国立公園等管理者を含む。以下この項において「景観行政団体等」という。）は、景観協議会（以下この条において「協議会」という。）を組織することができる。この場合において、景観行政団体等は、必要と認めるときは、協議会に、関係行政機関及び観光関係団体、商工関係団体、農林漁業団体、電気事業、電気通信事業、鉄道事業等の公益事業を営む者、住民その他良好な景観の形成の促進のための活動を行う者を加えることができる。

Article 15(1)A Landscape Administration Body, the manager of a Public Facility of Landscape Importance specified in a Landscape Plan, and a Landscape Development Organization designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 92, paragraph (1) (including the relevant municipality if the Landscape Administration Body is a prefecture or the manager of a National Park, etc., if any area of National Park or Quasi-National Park is included in the relevant Landscape Planning Area; hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as "Landscape Administration Body, etc.") may jointly form a landscape committee (hereinafter in this Article referred to as the "Committee") in order to hold consultations necessary for the formation of a good landscape in a Landscape Planning Area.In this case, if the Landscape Administration Body, etc. finds it necessary, it may include relevant administrative organs or tourism-related organizations, organizations related to commerce and industry, organizations related to agriculture, forestry and fishery, business operators providing public utilities such as electricity, telecommunications, and railway services, local residents, and any other person or persons who are engaged in activities to promote the development of a good landscape, as Committee members.

２協議会は、必要があると認めるときは、その構成員以外の関係行政機関及び事業者に対し、意見の表明、説明その他の必要な協力を求めることができる。

(2)If the Committee finds it necessary, it may seek cooperation including, but not limited to, statements of opinions and explanations from any relevant administrative organ or business operator other than a Committee member.

３第一項前段の協議を行うための会議において協議がととのった事項については、協議会の構成員は、その協議の結果を尊重しなければならない。

(3)A Committee member must respect the outcome of any consultation on the matters agreed upon at a Committee meeting that is held for the purpose of consultation prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (1).

４前三項に定めるもののほか、協議会の運営に関し必要な事項は、協議会が定める。

(4)All matters necessary for the operation of the Committee other than those prescribed in the preceding three paragraphs are determined by the Committee.

第十六条景観計画区域内において、次に掲げる行為をしようとする者は、あらかじめ、国土交通省令（第四号に掲げる行為にあっては、景観行政団体の条例。以下この条において同じ。）で定めるところにより、行為の種類、場所、設計又は施行方法、着手予定日その他国土交通省令で定める事項を景観行政団体の長に届け出なければならない。

Article 16(1)Before seeking to engage in any of the following actions in a Landscape Planning Area, the person seeking to do so shall, pursuant to Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (or to Ordinance of the Landscape Administration Body, for an action set forth in item (iv); the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article), notify the head of the relevant Landscape Administration Body of the type, place, design, construction method, and scheduled date of the commencement of the action, as well as other matters specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism:

２前項の規定による届出をした者は、その届出に係る事項のうち、国土交通省令で定める事項を変更しようとするときは、あらかじめ、その旨を景観行政団体の長に届け出なければならない。

(2)Before seeking to modify a matter specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism for which the notification provided for in the preceding paragraph has been filed, the person who has filed such notification shall file a notification to that effect with the head of the relevant Landscape Administration Body.

３景観行政団体の長は、前二項の規定による届出があった場合において、その届出に係る行為が景観計画に定められた当該行為についての制限に適合しないと認めるときは、その届出をした者に対し、その届出に係る行為に関し設計の変更その他の必要な措置をとることを勧告することができる。

(3)If a notification under the preceding two paragraphs has been filed and the head of the relevant Landscape Administration Body finds that the action under the notification does not comply with a restriction on the action which has been specified in the Landscape Plan, the head of the Landscape Administration Body may recommend the person who filed such notification to take necessary measures including but not limited to design changes in connection with the action.

４前項の勧告は、第一項又は第二項の規定による届出のあった日から三十日以内にしなければならない。

(4)A recommendation under the preceding paragraph must be made within thirty days after the date that the notification under the provisions of paragraph (1) or (2) was filed.

５前各項の規定にかかわらず、国の機関又は地方公共団体が行う行為については、第一項の届出をすることを要しない。この場合において、当該国の機関又は地方公共団体は、同項の届出を要する行為をしようとするときは、あらかじめ、景観行政団体の長にその旨を通知しなければならない。

5. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraphs, a notification prescribed in paragraph (1) is not required to be filed for an action in which a national agency or a local government engages. In this case, before seeking to engage in an action that requires the notification referred to in the paragraph, the relevant national agency or the relevant local government shall inform the head of the relevant Landscape Administration Body to that effect.5. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraphs, a notification prescribed in paragraph (1) is not required to be filed for an action in which a national agency or a local government engages.In this case, before seeking to engage in an action that requires the notification referred to in the paragraph, the relevant national agency or the relevant local government shall inform the head of the relevant Landscape Administration Body to that effect.

６景観行政団体の長は、前項後段の通知があった場合において、良好な景観の形成のため必要があると認めるときは、その必要な限度において、当該国の機関又は地方公共団体に対し、景観計画に定められた当該行為についての制限に適合するようとるべき措置について協議を求めることができる。

(6)If the head of a Landscape Administration Body, upon being informed as prescribed in the second sentence of the preceding paragraph, recognizes the necessity for the formation of a good landscape, the head of the Landscape Administration Body may seek a consultation with the relevant national agency or the relevant local government concerned to the extent necessary for the discussion of measures to be taken in order to make the planned action comply with the restrictions specified in the Landscape Plan.

７次に掲げる行為については、前各項の規定は、適用しない。

(7)The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall not apply to the following actions:

第十七条景観行政団体の長は、良好な景観の形成のために必要があると認めるときは、特定届出対象行為（前条第一項第一号又は第二号の届出を要する行為のうち、当該景観行政団体の条例で定めるものをいう。第七項及び次条第一項において同じ。）について、景観計画に定められた建築物又は工作物の形態意匠の制限に適合しないものをしようとする者又はした者に対し、当該制限に適合させるため必要な限度において、当該行為に関し設計の変更その他の必要な措置をとることを命ずることができる。この場合においては、前条第三項の規定は、適用しない。

Article 17(1)If the head of a Landscape Administration Body finds it to be necessary for the formation of a good landscape, the head of the Landscape Administration Body may order a person who seeks to engage in or who has engaged in a specified action subject to notification (meaning an action requiring the notification referred to in paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii) of the preceding Article, which is specified by Ordinance of the relevant Landscape Administration Body; the same shall apply in paragraph (7) of this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article) that does not comply with a restriction on the Design Features of a Building or structure which has been prescribed in a Landscape Plan, to take necessary measures including but not limited to modifying the design for the relevant action, to the extent necessary in order to make the action comply with the restrictions.In this case, the provisions of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article do not apply.

２前項の処分は、前条第一項又は第二項の届出をした者に対しては、当該届出があった日から三十日以内に限り、することができる。

(2)The disposition referred to in the preceding paragraph may only be issued to a person who has filed a notification referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article within thirty days from the day on which the notification is filed.

３第一項の処分は、前条第一項又は第二項の届出に係る建築物若しくは工作物又はこれらの部分の形態意匠が政令で定める他の法令の規定により義務付けられたものであるときは、当該義務の履行に支障のないものでなければならない。

(3)If the Design Features of a Building, structure, or a part of thereof under a notification referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article or a part thereof is required as an obligation pursuant to the provisions of any other law or regulation stipulated by Cabinet Order, the disposition referred to in paragraph (1) must not interfere with the fulfillment of the obligation.

４景観行政団体の長は、前条第一項又は第二項の届出があった場合において、実地の調査をする必要があるとき、その他第二項の期間内に第一項の処分をすることができない合理的な理由があるときは、九十日を超えない範囲でその理由が存続する間、第二項の期間を延長することができる。この場合においては、同項の期間内に、前条第一項又は第二項の届出をした者に対し、その旨、延長する期間及び延長する理由を通知しなければならない。

(4)If a notification referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article has been filed and it is necessary to conduct an on-site investigation or if there are reasonable grounds for the head of a Landscape Administration Body being unable to issue the disposition referred to in paragraph (1) within the period prescribed in paragraph (2), the head of the Landscape Administration Body may extend the period prescribed in paragraph (2) for up to ninety days, during the time that the reason exists.In this case, the head of the Landscape Administration Body shall, within the period prescribed in paragraph (2), notify the person who filed the notification referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article of that effect , the extension period, and the grounds therefor.

５景観行政団体の長は、第一項の処分に違反した者又はその者から当該建築物又は工作物についての権利を承継した者に対して、相当の期限を定めて、景観計画に定められた建築物又は工作物の形態意匠の制限に適合させるため必要な限度において、その原状回復を命じ、又は原状回復が著しく困難である場合に、これに代わるべき必要な措置をとることを命ずることができる。

(5)The head of a Landscape Administration Body may order a person who has violated a disposition referred to in paragraph (1) or a person who has succeeded to the rights to the relevant Building or structure from a person who has violated such a disposition, to restore the Building or structure to its original state, setting a reasonable period of time therefor, or may take necessary alternative measures if restoration to the original sate is extremely difficult, to the extent necessary in order to make a Building or structure conform to the restrictions on its Design Features which have been specified in the Landscape Plan.

６前項の規定により原状回復又はこれに代わるべき必要な措置（以下この条において「原状回復等」という。）を命じようとする場合において、過失がなくて当該原状回復等を命ずべき者を確知することができないときは、景観行政団体の長は、その者の負担において、当該原状回復等を自ら行い、又はその命じた者若しくは委任した者にこれを行わせることができる。この場合においては、相当の期限を定めて、当該原状回復等を行うべき旨及びその期限までに当該原状回復等を行わないときは、景観行政団体の長又はその命じた者若しくは委任した者が当該原状回復等を行う旨をあらかじめ公告しなければならない。

(6)If the head of a Landscape Administration Body seeks to order restoration to the original state or take a necessary alternative measure pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as "Restoration, etc." in this Article), and is without fault in being unable to ascertain the person that should be ordered to carry out the Restoration, etc., the head of the Landscape Administration Body may carry out the Restoration, etc., or order or commission another party to carry out the Restoration, etc., at the expense of that person.In this case, the head of the Landscape Administration Body shall give advance public notice that the person must carry out the Restoration, etc. within a reasonable period specified by the head of the Landscape Administration Body, and that if the person does not carry out the Restoration, etc. within the period, the Restoration, etc. will be carried out by the head of the Landscape Administration Body or by a party ordered or commissioned to do so by the head of the Landscape Administration Body.

７景観行政団体の長は、第一項の規定の施行に必要な限度において、同項の規定により必要な措置をとることを命ぜられた者に対し、当該措置の実施状況その他必要な事項について報告をさせ、又は景観行政団体の職員に、当該建築物の敷地若しくは当該工作物の存する土地に立ち入り、特定届出対象行為の実施状況を検査させ、若しくは特定届出対象行為が景観に及ぼす影響を調査させることができる。

(7)The head of a Landscape Administration Body may, either have a person who has been ordered to take necessary measures pursuant to paragraph (1) report the progress of the measures and other necessary matters, or have an employee or employees of the Landscape Administration Body enter the site of the relevant Building or the plot of land on which the relevant structure is located, and inspect the progress of the specified action subject to notification or investigate the influence on the landscape caused by the specified action subject to notification, to the extent necessary for the enforcement of the provisions of paragraph (1).

８第六項の規定により原状回復等を行おうとする者及び前項の規定により立入検査又は立入調査をする者は、その身分を示す証明書を携帯し、関係人の請求があった場合においては、これを提示しなければならない。

(8)A person seeking to carry out a Restoration, etc. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) and a person who conducts an on-site inspection or on-site investigation pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall carry a certificate of identity and present the same at the request of the persons concerned.

９第七項の規定による立入検査又は立入調査の権限は、犯罪捜査のために認められたものと解してはならない。

(9)The authority for on-site inspection or on-site investigation under the provisions of paragraph (7) may not be construed as authority granted for the purposes of criminal investigation.

第十八条第十六条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出をした者は、景観行政団体がその届出を受理した日から三十日（特定届出対象行為について前条第四項の規定により同条第二項の期間が延長された場合にあっては、その延長された期間）を経過した後でなければ、当該届出に係る行為（根切り工事その他の政令で定める工事に係るものを除く。第百三条第四号において同じ。）に着手してはならない。ただし、特定届出対象行為について前条第一項の命令を受け、かつ、これに基づき行う行為については、この限りでない。

Article 18(1)A person who has filed a notification under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (1) or (2) may not begin the action under the notification (excluding any action related to pit excavation or other construction work specified by Cabinet Order; the same shall apply in Article 103, item (iv)) until after thirty days (or, if the period prescribed in paragraph (2) of the Article with respect to the specified action subject to notification has been extended pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of the same Article, the extended period) have passed since the day on which the Landscape Administration Body received the notification;however, this shall not apply to any specified action subject to notification that is carried out under an order issued pursuant to paragraph (1) of the preceding Article.

２景観行政団体の長は、第十六条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出に係る行為について、良好な景観の形成に支障を及ぼすおそれがないと認めるときは、前項本文の期間を短縮することができる。

(2)If the head of a Landscape Administration Body finds that an action under a notification under Article 16, paragraph (1) or (2) does not interfere with the formation of a good landscape, the head of the Landscape Administration Body may shorten the period prescribed in the main clause of the preceding paragraph.

第四十七条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ロの景観重要公共施設の整備に関する事項が定められた場合においては、当該景観重要公共施設の整備は、当該景観計画に即して行われなければならない。

Article 47If matters related to the development of a Public Facility of Landscape Importance as referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (b) have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the development of the relevant Public Facility of Landscape Importance must be carried out in accordance with the Landscape Plan.

第四十八条景観計画に景観重要公共施設として定められた道路法による道路（以下「景観重要道路」という。）に関する電線共同溝の整備等に関する特別措置法（平成七年法律第三十九号）第三条の規定の適用については、同条第一項中「その安全かつ円滑な交通の確保と景観の整備を図るため」とあるのは「景観計画（景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画をいう。）に即し、その景観の整備と安全な交通の確保を図るため」と、「特に必要である」とあるのは「必要である」と、同条第二項中「市町村を除く。）」とあるのは「市町村を除く。）、当該指定に係る道路の存する区域において景観行政団体（景観法第七条第一項に規定する景観行政団体をいう。以下同じ。）である都道府県（当該指定に係る道路の道路管理者が都道府県である場合の当該都道府県及び次項の規定による要請をした都道府県を除く。）」と、同条第三項中「市町村」とあるのは「市町村又は景観行政団体である都道府県」とする。

Article 48With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 3 of the Act on Special Measures for the Construction, etc. of Common-Use Cable Tunnels (Act No. 39 of 1995) to a road prescribed under the Road Act that has been specified as a Public Facility of Landscape Importance in a Landscape Plan (hereinafter referred to as a "Road of Landscape Importance"), the words "in order to ensure a safe and smooth traffic flow and improve the landscape" in paragraph (1) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "in order to improve the landscape and ensure a safe and smooth traffic flow in accordance with a Landscape Plan (meaning a Landscape Plan as prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1), of the Landscape Act)"; the words "especially necessary" shall be deemed to be replaced with "necessary"; the words "the municipality (excluding any municipality acting as the road administrator of the road to be designated and any municipality that has made a request pursuant to the following paragraph)" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the municipality (excluding any municipality acting as the road administrator of the road to be designated and any municipality that has made a request pursuant to the following paragraph), the prefecture acting as the Landscape Administration Body (meaning a Landscape Administration Body prescribed in Article 7 paragraph (1) of the Landscape Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) in the area where there is a road to be designated as a "Road of Landscape Importance" (excluding any prefecture acting as the road administrator of the road to be designated and any prefecture that has made a request as prescribed in the following paragraph)"; and the words "municipality" in paragraph (3) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "municipality or prefecture acting as the Landscape Administration Body."

第四十九条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（１）の許可の基準に関する事項が定められた景観重要道路についての道路法第三十三条、第三十六条第二項及び第八十七条第一項の規定の適用については、同法第三十三条及び第三十六条第二項中「政令で定める基準」とあるのは「政令で定める基準及び景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ハ（１）の許可の基準」と、同法第八十七条第一項中「円滑な交通を確保する」とあるのは「円滑な交通を確保し、又は良好な景観を形成する」とする。

Article 49With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 33, Article 36, paragraph (2) and Article 87, paragraph (1) of the Road Act to a Road of Landscape Importance with respect to which matters connected with the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 1 have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the words "criteria specified by Cabinet Order" in Article 33 and Article 36, paragraph (2), of the Road Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "criteria specified by Cabinet Order and the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 1 of the Landscape Act which have been specified in a Landscape Plan prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; and the words "ensure a smooth traffic flow" in Article 87, paragraph (1) of the Road Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "ensure a smooth traffic flow or form a good landscape."

第五十条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（２）の許可の基準が定められた景観重要公共施設である河川法による河川（以下この条において「景観重要河川」という。）の河川区域（同法第六条第一項（同法第百条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する河川区域をいう。）内の土地における同法第二十四条、第二十五条、第二十六条第一項又は第二十七条第一項（これらの規定を同法第百条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による許可を要する行為については、当該景観重要河川の河川管理者（同法第七条（同法第百条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する河川管理者をいう。）は、当該行為が当該景観計画に定められた同号ハ（２）の許可の基準に適合しない場合には、これらの規定による許可をしてはならない。

Article 50With regard to an action that requires the permission under Article 24; Article 25; Article 26, paragraph (1); or Article 27, paragraph (1) of the River Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 100, paragraph (1) of the same Act) on land within the river zone (meaning a river zone prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 100, paragraph (1)) of the same Act) of a river under the River Act that constitutes a Public Facility of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 2 have been specified in a Landscape Plan (hereinafter in this Article referred to as a "River of Landscape Importance"), if the river administrator (meaning a river administrator prescribed in Article 7 of the River Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 100, paragraph (1) of the River Act)) of the relevant River of Landscape Importance finds that said the relevantaction does not conform to the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 2 that are specified in the relevant Landscape Plan, the river administrator may not grant the permission under the provisions of the River Act.

第五十一条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（３）の許可の基準（都市公園法第五条第一項の許可に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）が定められた景観重要公共施設である同法による都市公園（以下この条において「景観重要都市公園」という。）における同法第五条第一項の許可を要する行為については、当該景観重要都市公園の公園管理者（同項に規定する公園管理者をいう。）は、当該行為が当該景観計画に定められた同号ハ（３）の許可の基準に適合しない場合には、同項の許可をしてはならない。

Article 51(1)With regard to an action that requires the permission referred to in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Urban Park Act in an urban park under the same Act that constitutes a Public Facility of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 3 (limited to criteria for the permission referred to in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Urban Park Act; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) have been specified in a Landscape Plan (hereinafter in this Article referred to as an "Urban Park of Landscape Importance"), if the park administrator (meaning a park administrator prescribed in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Urban Park Act) of the relevant Urban Park of Landscape Importance finds that the relevant action does not conform to the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 3 that are specified in the relevant Landscape Plan, the park administrator may not grant the permission referred to in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Urban Park Act.

２景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（３）の許可の基準（都市公園法第六条第一項又は第三項の許可に係るものに限る。）が定められた景観重要都市公園についての同法第七条の規定の適用については、同条中「政令で定める技術的基準」とあるのは、「政令で定める技術的基準及び景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ハ（３）の許可の基準」とする。

(2)With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 7 of the Urban Park Act to an Urban Park of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 3 (limited to criteria for the permission referred to in Article 6, paragraph (1) or (3) of the Urban Park Act) have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the words "technical standards specified by Cabinet Order" in Article 7 of the Urban Park Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "technical standards specified by Cabinet Order and the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 3 of the Landscape Act that are specified in a Landscape Plan prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act."

第五十一条の二景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（４）の許可の基準が定められた景観重要公共施設である津波防災地域づくりに関する法律による津波防護施設についての同法第二十二条第二項及び第二十三条第二項の規定の適用については、同法第二十二条第二項中「及ぼすおそれがある」とあるのは「及ぼすおそれがあり、又は景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ハ（４）の許可の基準（前項の許可に係るものに限る。）に適合しないものである」と、同法第二十三条第二項中「前条第二項」とあるのは「景観法第五十一条の二の規定により読み替えて適用する前条第二項」と、「準用する」とあるのは「準用する。この場合において、同条第二項中「前項の許可に係るもの」とあるのは、「次条第一項の許可に係るもの」と読み替えるものとする」とする。

Article 51-2With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 22, paragraph (2) and Article 23, paragraph (2) of the Act on Regional Development for Tsunami Disaster Prevention to a tsunami defense facility that constitutes a Public Facility of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 4 have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the words "is likely to seriously interfere with the preservation of a tsunami defence facility" in Article 22, paragraph (2) of the Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is likely to seriously interfere with the preservation of a tsunami defence facility or does not conform to the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 4 of the Landscape Act (limited to criteria for the permission referred to in the preceding paragraph) that are specified in a Landscape Plan prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; the words "paragraph (2) of the preceding Article" in Article 23, paragraph (2) of the Act on Regional Development for Tsunami Disaster Prevention shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (2) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of Article 51-2 of the Landscape Act"; and the words "apply mutatis mutandis to the permission under the preceding paragraph" shall be deemed to be replaced with "apply mutatis mutandis to the permission under the preceding paragraph.In this case, the words 'criteria for the permission referred to in the preceding paragraph' in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with 'criteria for the permission referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article.'"

第五十二条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（５）の許可の基準（海岸法第七条第一項又は第八条第一項の許可に係るものに限る。）が定められた景観重要公共施設である海岸保全区域等に係る海岸（次項において「景観重要海岸」という。）についての同法第七条第二項及び第八条第二項の規定の適用については、同法第七条第二項中「及ぼすおそれがある」とあるのは「及ぼすおそれがあり、又は景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ハ（５）の許可の基準（前項の許可に係るものに限る。）に適合しないものである」と、同法第八条第二項中「前条第二項」とあるのは「景観法第五十二条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する前条第二項」と、「準用する」とあるのは「準用する。この場合において、同条第二項中「前項の許可に係るもの」とあるのは、「次条第一項の許可に係るもの」と読み替えるものとする」とする。

Article 52(1)With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (2) and Article 8, paragraph (2) of the Coast Act to the coast in a coastal preservation area, etc. that constitutes a Public Facility of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 5 (limited to criteria for the permission referred to in Article 7, paragraph (1) or Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Coast Act) have been specified in a Landscape Plan (referred to in the following paragraph as a "Coast of Landscape Importance"), the words "is likely to seriously interfere with coastal protection" in Article 7, paragraph (2) of the Coast Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is likely to seriously interfere with coastal protection or does not conform to the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 5 of the Landscape Act (limited to criteria for the permission referred to in the preceding paragraph) that have been specified in a Landscape Plan prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; the words "paragraph (2) of the preceding Article" in Article 8, paragraph (2) of the Coast Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (2) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Landscape Act"; and the words "apply mutatis mutandis to the permission under the preceding paragraph" shall be deemed to be replaced with "apply mutatis mutandis to the permission under the preceding paragraph.In this case, the words 'criteria for the permission referred to in the preceding paragraph' in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with 'criteria for the permission referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article.'"

２景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（５）の許可の基準（海岸法第三十七条の四又は第三十七条の五の許可に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）が定められた景観重要海岸の一般公共海岸区域（同法第二条第二項に規定する一般公共海岸区域をいう。）内における同法第三十七条の四又は第三十七条の五の許可を要する行為については、当該景観重要海岸の海岸管理者（同法第二条第三項に規定する海岸管理者をいう。）は、当該行為が当該景観計画に定められた同号ハ（５）の許可の基準に適合しない場合には、これらの規定による許可をしてはならない。

(2)With regard to an action that requires the permission under Article 37-4 or Article 37-5 of the Coast Act in a public seacoast area (meaning a public seacoast area prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Coast Act) that is a Coast of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 5 (limited to criteria for the permission referred to in Article 37-4 or Article 37-5 of the Coast Act; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) have been specified in a Landscape Plan, if the coast administrator (meaning a coast administrator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (3) of the Coast Act) of the relevant Coast of Landscape Importance finds that the relevant action does not conform to the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 5 that are specified in the relevant Landscape Plan, the coast administrator may not grant the permission under these provisions of the Coast Act.

第五十三条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（６）の許可の基準が定められた景観重要公共施設である港湾法による港湾についての同法第三十七条第二項の規定の適用については、同項中「又は第三条の三第九項」とあるのは「若しくは第三条の三第九項」と、「与えるものである」とあるのは「与えるものであり、又は景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ハ（６）の許可の基準に適合しないものである」とする。

Article 53With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 37, paragraph (2) of the Port and Harbor Act to a port or a harbor under the Act that constitutes a Public Facility of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 6 have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the words "or seriously impede the implementation of the Port Plan made public pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (9) or (10) of Article 3-3," in Article 37, paragraph (2) of the Act shall be deemed to be replaced with ", seriously impede the implementation of the Port Plan made public pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (9) or (10) of Article 3-3,"; and the words ", or otherwise considerably interfere with the development of the port;" shall be deemed to be replaced with "; considerably interfere with the development of the port; or do not comply with the permission criteria referred to in Article 8 paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 6 of the Landscape Act that have been specified in a Landscape Plan as prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act."

第五十四条景観計画に第八条第二項第四号ハ（７）の許可の基準が定められた景観重要公共施設である漁港漁場整備法による漁港についての同法第三十九条第二項及び第三項の規定の適用については、同条第二項中「又は漁港」とあるのは「若しくは漁港」と、「与える」とあるのは「与え、又は景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ハ（７）の許可の基準に適合しない」と、同条第三項中「保全上」とあるのは「保全上又は良好な景観の形成上」とする。

Article 54With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 39, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Act on the Development of Fishing Ports and Grounds to a fishing port under the same Act that constitutes a Public Facility of Landscape Importance for which the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 7 have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the words "or otherwise considerably interfere with the preservation of a fishing port," in Article 39, paragraph (2) of the Act on Development of Fishing Ports and Grounds shall be deemed to be replaced with "or otherwise considerably interfere with the preservation of a fishing port; or do not comply with the permission criteria referred to in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c) 7 of the Landscape Act that have been specified in a Landscape Plan prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; and the words "for the conservation of a fishing port" in paragraph (3) of the Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "for the conservation of a fishing port or the formation of a good landscape."

第五十五条市町村は、第八条第二項第四号ニに掲げる基本的な事項が定められた景観計画に係る景観計画区域のうち農業振興地域（農業振興地域の整備に関する法律第六条第一項の規定により指定された地域をいう。）内にあるものについて、農業振興地域整備計画を達成するとともに、景観と調和のとれた良好な営農条件を確保するため、その地域の特性にふさわしい農用地（同法第三条第一号に規定する農用地をいう。以下同じ。）及び農業用施設その他の施設の整備を一体的に推進する必要があると認める場合には、景観農業振興地域整備計画を定めることができる。

Article 55(1)If a municipality finds it necessary to facilitate the integrated development of agricultural land (meaning agricultural land prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Act on Establishment of Agricultural Promotion Regions; the same shall apply hereinafter), agricultural facilities, and other facilities suitable for the characteristics of the region in order to execute an agricultural promotion region development plan and ensure favorable agricultural conditions in harmony with the landscape in a Landscape Planning Area that is located within an agricultural promotion region (meaning an agricultural promotion region designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Act) and for which the basic matters listed in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (d) have been specified in a Landscape Plan, the municipality may formulate a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan.

２景観農業振興地域整備計画においては、次に掲げる事項を定めるものとする。

(2)A landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan must specify the following:

３景観農業振興地域整備計画は、景観計画及び農業振興地域整備計画に適合するとともに、農業振興地域の整備に関する法律第四条第三項に規定する計画との調和が保たれたものであり、かつ、前項第一号の区域の自然的経済的社会的諸条件を考慮して、当該区域において総合的に農業の振興を図るため必要な事項を一体的に定めるものでなければならない。

(3)A landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan must be consistent with the Landscape Plan and the agricultural promotion region development plan, in harmony with any of the plans prescribed in Article 4 paragraph (3) of the Act on Establishment of Agricultural Promotion Regions, and shall specify, in an integrated manner, all matters necessary for the comprehensive promotion of agriculture, in light of the natural, economic, and social conditions in the region referred to in item (i) of the preceding paragraph.

４農業振興地域の整備に関する法律第八条第四項、第十条第二項、第十一条（第九項後段及び第十二項を除く。）、第十二条並びに第十三条第一項前段及び第四項の規定は、景観農業振興地域整備計画について準用する。この場合において、同法第八条第四項中「ときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該農業振興地域整備計画のうち第二項第一号に掲げる事項に係るもの（以下「農用地利用計画」という。）について」とあるのは「ときは」と、「協議し、その同意を得なければ」とあるのは「協議しなければ」と、同法第十一条第三項中「農業振興地域整備計画のうち農用地利用計画に係る農用地区域内」とあるのは「景観農業振興地域整備計画（景観法第五十五条第一項の規定により定められた景観農業振興地域整備計画をいう。以下同じ。）に係る同条第二項第一号の区域内」と、「当該農用地利用計画」とあるのは「当該景観農業振興地域整備計画」と、「同項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同条第十項中「農用地区域」とあるのは「景観法第五十五条第二項第一号の区域」と、同条第十一項中「農用地等としての利用に供する」とあるのは「景観農業振興地域整備計画に従って利用する」と、同法第十三条第一項前段中「農業振興地域整備基本方針」とあるのは「景観法第八条第一項の景観計画若しくは農業振興地域整備計画」と、「変更により、前条第一項の規定による基礎調査の結果により」とあるのは「変更により」と、「生じたときは、政令で定めるところにより」とあるのは「生じたときは」と、同条第四項中「（第十二項」とあるのは「（第九条後段及び第十二項」と、「同条第二項」とあるのは「第八条第四項中「ときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該農業振興地域整備計画のうち第二項第一号に掲げる事項に係るもの（以下「農用地利用計画」という。）について」とあるのは「ときは」と、「協議し、その同意を得なければ」とあるのは「協議しなければ」と、第十二条第二項」と、「とあるのは、」とあるのは「とあるのは」と読み替えるものとする。

(4)The provisions of Article 8, paragraph (4); Article 10, paragraph (2); Article 11 (excluding the second sentence in paragraph (9) and paragraph (12)); Article 12; the first sentence in paragraph (1) of Article 13; and paragraph (4) of the same Article of the Act on Establishment of Agricultural Promotion Regions shall apply mutatis mutandis to all landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plans.In this case, in Article 8, paragraph (4) of the same Act, the words "shall consult with the prefectural governor and obtain the consent thereof for any agricultural promotion region development plan concerning matters listed in paragraph (2), item (i) (hereinafter referred to as the "Agricultural Land Use Plan"), pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall consult with the prefectural governor"; the words "within an agricultural land region covered by the Agricultural Land Use Plan in an agricultural promotion region development plan" in Article 11, paragraph (3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within an region referred to in Article 55, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Landscape Act that is covered by a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan (meaning a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan as prescribed in Article 55, paragraph (1) of the Landscape Act; the same shall apply hereinafter)"; the words "the relevant Agricultural Land Use Plan" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the relevant landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan"; the words "the same paragraph" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; the words "agricultural land region" in Article 11, paragraph (10) of the Act on Establishment of Agricultural Promotion Regions shall be deemed to be replaced with "an region prescribed in Article 55, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Landscape Act"; the words "use the state-owned land as agricultural land, etc." in Article 11, paragraph (11), of the Act on Establishment of Agricultural Promotion Regions shall be deemed to be replaced with "use thethe state-owned land in accordance with a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan"; in the first sentence in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the words "basic policy for agricultural promotion region development" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Landscape Plan as prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Landscape Act or an agricultural promotion region development plan"; the words ", as a result of a basic survey as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, or because" shall be deemed to be replaced with "or because"; the words "agricultural promotion region development plan as prescribed by Cabinet Order" shall be deemed to be replaced with "agricultural promotion area development plan"; in Article 13, paragraph (4) of the same Act the words "paragraph (12))" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the second sentence in Article 9 and paragraph (12))"; the words "in Article 12, paragraph (2)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in Article 8, paragraph (4) the words 'shall consult with the prefectural governor and obtain the consent thereof for any agricultural promotion region development plan relating to matters listed in paragraph (2), item (1), (hereinafter referred to as the "Agricultural Land Use Plan"), pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order' shall be deemed to be replaced with 'shall consult with the prefectural governor'; and in Article 12, paragraph (2)"; and the words ", the words" shall be deemed to be replaced with "; and the words."

第五十六条市町村長は、前条第二項第一号の区域内にある土地が景観農業振興地域整備計画に従って利用されていない場合において、景観農業振興地域整備計画の達成のため必要があるときは、その土地の所有者又はその土地について所有権以外の権原に基づき使用及び収益をする者に対し、その土地を当該景観農業振興地域整備計画に従って利用すべき旨を勧告することができる。

Article 56(1)If a plot of land located in an region prescribed in paragraph (2), item (i) of the preceding Article is not being used in accordance with a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan, and it is necessary for executing the landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan, the mayor of the municipality may recommend the owner of the plot of land or any person who is using and profiting from the plot of land based on any title other than that of ownership, that the owner or the person use the plot of land in accordance with the landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan.

２市町村長は、前項の規定による勧告をした場合において、その勧告を受けた者がこれに従わないとき、又は従う見込みがないと認めるときは、その者に対し、その土地を景観農業振興地域整備計画に従って利用するためその土地について所有権又は使用及び収益を目的とする権利を取得しようとする者で市町村長の指定を受けたものとその土地についての所有権の移転又は使用及び収益を目的とする権利の設定若しくは移転に関し協議すべき旨を勧告することができる。

(2)If the mayor of the municipality has made a recommendation under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the person to whom the recommendation has been made does not or is not likely to follow the recommendation, the mayor of the municipality may recommend the person to agree to transfer the ownership or to establish or transfer a right to use or profit from the plot of land to a person seeking to acquire ownership or the right to use and profit from the plot of land who has been designated by the mayor, so that the plot of land is used in accordance with a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan.

第五十七条前条第二項に規定する場合において、同項の規定により景観整備機構が指定されたときは、農業委員会（農業委員会等に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第八十八号）第三条第五項の規定により農業委員会を置かない市町村にあっては、市町村長）は、前条第二項の勧告に係る協議が調ったことによりその勧告を受けた者がその勧告に係る農地又は採草放牧地（農地法（昭和二十七年法律第二百二十九号）第二条第一項に規定する農地又は採草放牧地をいう。以下同じ。）につき当該景観整備機構のために使用貸借による権利又は賃借権を設定しようとするときは、同法第三条第二項の規定にかかわらず、同条第一項の許可をすることができる。

Article 57(1)Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 3, paragraph (2) of the Agricultural Land Act (Act No. 229 of 1952), in a case provided for in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, if a Landscape Development Organization has been designated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and, due to an agreement that was reached in connection with the recommendation referred to in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, the person subject to such recommendation seeks to establish a right through a loan for the use of, or a right of lease to the agricultural land or pasture land (meaning agricultural land or pasture land as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Land Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) subject to the recommendation in favor of the Landscape Development Organization, an agriculture commission (or, in a municipality without an agriculture commission as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (5) of the Act on Agriculture Commission, etc. (Act No. 88 of 1951), the mayor of that municipality) may grant the permission referred to in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Land Act.

２前条第二項の勧告に係る協議が調ったことにより景観整備機構のために貸借権が設定されている農地又は採草放牧地の賃貸借については、農地法第十七条本文並びに第十八条第一項本文、第七項及び第八項の規定は、適用しない。

(2)The provisions of the main clauses of Article 17 and Article 18, paragraph (1), and Article 18, paragraph (7) and (8) of the Agricultural Land Act shall not apply to the lease of agricultural land or pasture land in relation to which a right of lease has been established in favor of a Landscape Development Organization based on an agreement that was reached in connection with the recommendation referred to in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article.

第五十八条都道府県知事は、農業振興地域の整備に関する法律第十五条の二第一項の許可をしようとする場合において、同項に規定する開発行為に係る土地が第五十五条第二項第一号の区域内にあるときは、当該開発行為が同法第十五条の二第四項各号のいずれかに該当するほか、当該開発行為により当該開発行為に係る土地を景観農業振興地域整備計画に従って利用することが困難となると認めるときは、これを許可してはならない。

Article 58(1)If the prefectural governor seeks to grant the permission referred to in Article 15-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Development of Agricultural Promotion Regions, if the land involved in the development activity prescribed in the paragraph is located in an area prescribed in Article 55, paragraph (2), item (i), and if the prefectural governor finds that the development activity satisfies any of the items of Article 15-2, paragraph (4) of the same Act or that the development activity makes it difficult for the land involved in the development activity to be used in accordance with the landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan, the prefectural governor may not grant the permission for the action.

２前項の許可についての農業振興地域の整備に関する法律第十五条の二第五項の規定の適用については、同項中「農業上の利用を確保するために」とあるのは、「農業上の利用又は景観法第五十五条第一項の規定により定められた景観農業振興地域整備計画に従った利用を確保するために」とする。

(2)With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 15-2, paragraph (5) of the Act on Development of Agricultural Promotion Regions to the permission prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the words "to ensure that the land involved in the relevant development activity and the agricultural land, etc. around there is used for agriculture" shall be deemed to be replaced with "to ensure that the land involved in the relevant development activity and the agricultural land, etc. around there is used for agriculture and that it is used in accordance with a landscape-oriented agricultural promotion region development plan formulated pursuant to the provisions of Article 55, paragraph (1), of the Landscape Act".

第五十九条市町村は、森林法（昭和二十六年法律第二百四十九号）第十条の六第二項及び第三項に規定する場合のほか、その区域内にある同法第五条第一項の規定によりたてられた地域森林計画の対象とする森林につき、景観計画に即してその公益的機能の維持増進を図ることが適当と認める場合には、同法第十条の五第一項の規定によりたてられた市町村森林整備計画の一部を変更することができる。

Article 59(1)In addition to in a case prescribed in Article 10-6, paragraph (2) and (3) of the Forest Act (Act No. 249 of 1951), if a municipality finds it appropriate to maintain and enhance the public interest function of a forest within an area of the municipality for which a regional forest plan has been formulated pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Act in light of the Landscape Plan, the municipality may alter the part of the municipal forest development plan formulated pursuant to the provisions of Article 10-5, paragraph (1) of the Act.

２前項の規定による変更は、森林法第十条の六第三項の規定によりしたものとみなす。

(2)An alteration under the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 10-6, paragraph (3) of the Forest Act.

第六十条第八条第二項第四号ホに掲げる事項が定められた景観計画に係る景観計画区域内における自然公園法第二十条第四項、第二十一条第四項及び第二十二条第四項の規定の適用については、これらの規定中「環境省令で定める基準」とあるのは、「環境省令で定める基準及び景観法第八条第一項に規定する景観計画に定められた同条第二項第四号ホの許可の基準」とする。

Article 60With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 20, paragraph (4); Article 21, paragraph (4); and Article 22, paragraph (4) of the Natural Park Act in a Landscape Planning Area covered by a Landscape Plan that specifies the matters listed in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (e), the words in the provisions thereof "the criteria specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the criteria specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment and the criteria prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iv), (e) of the Landscape Act that has been specified in a Landscape Plan prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (1) of the same Act."

第七十四条市町村は、都市計画区域及び準都市計画区域外の景観計画区域のうち、相当数の建築物の建築が行われ、現に良好な景観が形成されている一定の区域について、その景観の保全を図るため、準景観地区を指定することができる。

Article 74(1)A municipality may designate an area in a landscape district that is located outside of a City Planning Area or Quasi-City Planning Area, in which a considerable number of Buildings have been built and in which a good landscape has currently been formed, as a Quasi-Landscape District, in order to preserve the landscape of the area.

２市町村は、準景観地区を指定しようとするときは、あらかじめ、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、その旨を公告し、当該準景観地区の区域の案を、当該準景観地区を指定しようとする理由を記載した書面を添えて、当該公告から二週間公衆の縦覧に供しなければならない。

(2)Before seeking to designate a Quasi-Landscape District, a municipality shall give public notice of this pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, and shall make the proposal for the Quasi-Landscape District area, accompanied by a document stating the reason for the proposed designation, available for public inspection for a period of two weeks from the date of the public notice.

３前項の規定による公告があったときは、住民及び利害関係人は、同項の縦覧期間満了の日までに、縦覧に供された準景観地区の区域の案について、市町村に意見書を提出することができる。

(3)When the public notice under the preceding paragraph has been given, a resident or interested party may submit a written opinion on the proposal for the Quasi-Landscape District area that is available for public inspection, to the relevant municipality by the end of the inspection period referred to in the same paragraph.

４市町村は、第一項の規定により準景観地区を指定しようとするときは、あらかじめ、前項の規定により提出された意見書の写しを添えて、都道府県知事に協議しなければならない。この場合において、町村にあっては、都道府県知事の同意を得なければならない。

(4)Before seeking to designate a Quasi-Landscape District pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), a municipality shall consult with the prefectural governor, with reference to copies of all written opinions submitted pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph. A town or a village must obtain the consent of the prefectural governor in such a case.

５準景観地区の指定は、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、公告することにより行う。

(5)The designation of a Quasi-Landscape District is made through the issuance of a public notice as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism.

６前各項の規定は、準景観地区の変更について準用する。

(6)The provisions of the each of the preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to any alteration of a Quasi-Landscape District.

第七十五条市町村は、準景観地区内における建築物又は工作物について、景観地区内におけるこれらに対する規制に準じて政令で定める基準に従い、条例で、良好な景観を保全するため必要な規制（建築物については、建築基準法第六十八条の九第二項の規定に基づく条例により行われるものを除く。）をすることができる。

Article 75(1)A municipality may stipulate, by Ordinance, the necessary regulations for the preservation of a good landscape, in connection with Buildings and structures in a Quasi-Landscape District (excluding stipulating regulations on Buildings through Ordinance enacted based on the provisions of Article 68-9, paragraph (2) of the Building Standards Act), in accordance with the criteria specified by Cabinet Order and in a manner equivalent to the regulations on Buildings and structures in a Landscape District.

２市町村は、準景観地区内において、開発行為その他政令で定める行為について、政令で定める基準に従い、条例で、良好な景観を保全するため必要な規制をすることができる。

(2)A municipality may stipulate, by Ordinance, the necessary regulations for the preservation of a good landscape, in connection with Development Activity in a Quasi-Landscape District or any other action specified by Cabinet Order, in accordance with the criteria specified by Cabinet Order.

３都市計画法第五十一条の規定は、前項の規定に基づく条例の規定による処分に対する不服について準用する。

(3)The provisions of Article 51 of the City Planning Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an objection to a disposition under the provisions of any Ordinance enacted based on the provisions of preceding paragraph.

第七十六条市町村は、地区計画等の区域（地区整備計画、特定建築物地区整備計画、防災街区整備地区整備計画、歴史的風致維持向上地区整備計画、沿道地区整備計画又は集落地区整備計画において、建築物又は工作物（以下この条において「建築物等」という。）の形態意匠の制限が定められている区域に限る。）内における建築物等の形態意匠について、政令で定める基準に従い、条例で、当該地区計画等において定められた建築物等の形態意匠の制限に適合するものとしなければならないこととすることができる。

Article 76(1)A municipality may stipulate, by Ordinance and in accordance with the criteria specified by Cabinet Order, that the Design Features of Buildings and structures in an area covered by a district plan, etc. (limited to an area for which restrictions on the Design Features of Buildings or structures (hereinafter in this Article referred to as "Buildings, etc.") have been stipulated in a district development plan, district development plan for specified buildings, district development plan for disaster prevention zone development, district development plan for the maintenance and enhancement of historic scenery, roadside district development plan, or rural district development plan) must comply with the restrictions on the Design Features of Buildings, etc. that have been stipulated in the district plan, etc.

２前項の規定による制限は、建築物等の利用上の必要性、当該区域内における土地利用の状況等を考慮し、当該地区計画等の区域の特性にふさわしい良好な景観の形成を図るため、合理的に必要と認められる限度において行うものとする。

(2)Restrictions under the provisions of the preceding paragraph must be stipulated to the extent found reasonably necessary for the formation of a good landscape that is appropriate for the characteristics of the area covered by the relevant district plan, etc., in consideration of factors such as of the necessity of Buildings, etc. from the perspective of their use, and land use status in the relevant area.

３第一項の規定に基づく条例（以下「地区計画等形態意匠条例」という。）には、第六十三条、第六十四条、第六十六条、第六十八条及び第七十一条の規定の例により、当該条例の施行のため必要な市町村長による計画の認定、違反建築物又は違反工作物に対する違反是正のための措置その他の措置に関する規定を定めることができる。

(3)Ordinance enacted based on the provisions of paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as an "Ordinance on Design Features in District Plans, etc.") may stipulate provisions on the certification of plans by the mayor of the municipality, measures to rectify the violation of a Building or structure that is in violation, and other measures necessary for the enforcement of the Ordinance, based on the exemplary provisions of Articles 63, 64, 66, 68, and 71.

４前項の規定は、第六十三条第二項及び第六十六条第三項の規定の例により地区計画等形態意匠条例に定めた市町村長の認定の審査の手続について、これらの規定に反しない限り、当該条例で必要な規定を定めることを妨げるものではない。

(4)The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not preclude any necessary provisions on examination procedures for certification by the mayor of the municipality from being set forth in Ordinance on Design Features in District Plans, etc., so long as such provisions do not contravene the provisions of theOrdinance that have been set forth for such procedures based on the exemplary provisions of Article 63, paragraph (2), and Article 66, paragraph (3).

５地区計画等形態意匠条例には、市町村長は、当該条例の規定により第六十四条第一項の処分に相当する処分をしたときは、当該処分が建築物の建築等に係る場合にあっては当該処分に係る建築物の設計者、工事監理者若しくは工事の請負人又は当該建築物について宅地建物取引業に係る取引をした宅地建物取引業者の氏名又は名称及び住所その他国土交通省令で定める事項を建築士法、建設業法又は宅地建物取引業法の定めるところによりこれらの者を監督する国土交通大臣又は都道府県知事に、当該処分が工作物の建設等に係る場合にあっては当該処分に係る工作物の工事の請負人の氏名又は名称及び住所その他国土交通省令で定める事項を建設業法の定めるところにより当該請負人を監督する国土交通大臣又は都道府県知事に、それぞれ通知しなければならない旨を定めることができる。

(5)Ordinance on Design Features in District Plans, etc. may set forth provisions to the effect that a mayor of a municipality who has issued a disposition equivalent to the disposition prescribed in Article 64, paragraph (1) pursuant to the Ordinance must report the name or trade name and address of the designer, construction supervisor, or construction contractor of the Building subject to the disposition or the real estate transaction business operator engaged in a transaction relating to a Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business involving the Building, and other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism or the prefectural governor who is responsible for the supervision of the foregoing persons pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Architects and Building Engineers, the Construction Business Act, or the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act, if the disposition relates to the Building, etc., of a Building; or that such mayor must report the name or trade name and address of the contractor engaged in the Construction, etc. of the structure subject to the disposition and other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism or the prefectural governor who is responsible for the supervision of the contractor pursuant to the provisions of the Construction Business Act, if the disposition relates to the Construction, etc. of a structure.

６国土交通大臣又は都道府県知事は、前項の規定に基づく地区計画等形態意匠条例の規定により同項の通知を受けた場合においては、遅滞なく、当該通知に係る者について、建築士法、建設業法又は宅地建物取引業法による業務の停止の処分その他必要な措置を講ずるものとし、その結果を当該通知をした市町村長に通知しなければならない。

(6)If the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism or a prefectural governor receives a notice prescribed in the preceding paragraph pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance on Design Features in District Plans, etc. which are based on the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Minister or governor shall issue a disposition for the suspension of business under the Act on Architects and Building Engineers, the Construction Business Act, or the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act, or take other necessary measures against the person with respect to whom the notice has been given, without delay, and shall notify the mayor of the municipality who made the notice of the results of the measures taken.

第七十七条非常災害があった場合において、その発生した区域又はこれに隣接する区域で市町村長が指定するものの内においては、災害により破損した建築物若しくは工作物の応急の修繕又は次の各号のいずれかに該当する応急仮設建築物の建築等若しくは応急仮設工作物の建設等若しくは設置でその災害が発生した日から一月以内にその工事に着手するものについては、この章の規定は、適用しない。

Article 77(1)In the event of an extraordinary disaster, in the area affected by the disaster and adjoining areas specified by the mayor of the municipality, the provisions of this Chapter do not apply to the emergency repair of Buildings or structures damaged by the disaster, to the Building, etc. of emergency temporary Buildings, or to the Construction, etc. or installation of emergency temporary structures falling under any of the items listed below that starts within one month after the day the disaster occurred:

２災害があった場合において建築等又は建設等若しくは設置をする停車場、官公署その他これらに類する公益上必要な用途に供する応急仮設建築物若しくは応急仮設工作物又は工事を施工するために現場に設ける事務所、下小屋、材料置場その他これらに類する仮設建築物若しくは仮設工作物については、この章の規定は、適用しない。

(2)The provisions of this chapter do not apply to railway stations, public offices, and any other similar emergency temporary Buildings or emergency temporary structures that serve a necessary role in the public interest, nor to offices, construction sheds, material yards, and other similar temporary Buildings or structures set up at construction sites for the purpose of construction work, whose Building, etc., Construction, etc., or installation is carried out when there has been a disaster.

３前二項の応急仮設建築物の建築等又は応急仮設工作物の建設等若しくは設置をした者は、その工事を完了した後三月を超えてこの章の規定の適用を受けないで当該建築物又は工作物を存続しようとする場合においては、その超えることとなる日前に、市町村長の許可を受けなければならない。ただし、当該許可の申請をした場合において、その超えることとなる日前に当該申請に対する処分がされないときは、当該処分がされるまでの間は、なおこの章の規定の適用を受けないで当該建築物又は工作物を存続することができる。

(3)If a person who has carried out the Building, etc. of an emergency temporary Building or the Construction, etc. of an emergency temporary structure referred to in the preceding two paragraphs seeks to preserve the Building or structure beyond three months after the completion thereof without being subject to the application of the provisions of this Chapter, the person must obtain permission from the mayor of the municipality before three months have elapsed after its completion; provided, however, that if an application for the permission has been made but no disposition has been reached in response to such application before three months have elapsed after its completion, the Building or structure may be preserved without being subject to the application of the provisions of this Chapter until the disposition has been reached.

４市町村長は、前項の許可の申請があった場合において、良好な景観の形成に著しい支障がないと認めるときは、二年以内の期間を限って、その許可をすることができる。

(4)If an application for the permission referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed and the mayor of the municipality finds that this does not materially interfere with the formation of a good landscape, the mayor of the municipality may grant such permission for a period of up to two years.

５市町村長は、第三項の許可の申請があった場合において、良好な景観の形成のため必要があると認めるときは、許可に必要な条件を付することができる。

(5)If an application for the permission referred to in paragraph (3) has been filed and the mayor of the municipality finds this to be necessary for the formation of a good landscape, the mayor of the municipality may attach any necessary conditions to such permission.

第七十八条市町村長は、都道府県知事又は国土交通大臣に対し、この章の規定の適用に関し必要な助言又は援助を求めることができる。

Article 78(1)A mayor of a municipality may seek necessary advice or assistance from the prefectural governor or the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism with regard to the application of the provisions of this Chapter.

２国土交通大臣及び都道府県知事は、市町村長に対し、この章の規定の適用に関し必要な勧告、助言又は援助をすることができる。

(2)The Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism and the prefectural governor may provide the mayor of a municipality with the necessary recommendations, advice, or assistance with regard to the application of the provisions of this Chapter.

第七十九条国土交通大臣は、市町村長がこの章の規定若しくは当該規定に基づく命令の規定に違反し、又はこれらの規定に基づく処分を怠っている場合において、国の利害に重大な関係がある建築物に関し必要があると認めるときは、当該市町村長に対して、期限を定めて、必要な措置をとるべきことを指示することができる。

Article 79(1)If the mayor of a municipality violates any of the provisions of this Chapter or provisions of any Order based on the provisions, or if such mayor fails to render a disposition based on these provisions, and the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism finds it to be necessary in connection with any Building that is greatly related to the national interest, the Minister may instruct the mayor of the municipality to take any necessary measures within a period of time specified by the Minister.

２市町村長は、正当な理由がない限り、前項の規定により国土交通大臣が行った指示に従わなければならない。

(2)Unless there are justifiable grounds for not doing so, the mayor of a municipality shall comply with instructions that the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism gives pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

３国土交通大臣は、市町村長が正当な理由がなく、所定の期限までに、第一項の規定による指示に従わない場合においては、正当な理由がないことについて社会資本整備審議会の確認を得た上で、自ら当該指示に係る必要な措置をとることができる。

(3)If the mayor of a municipality does not comply with the instructions under paragraph (1) within the specified period of time and is without justifiable grounds for not doing so, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism may himself or herself take the necessary measures under the instructions upon obtaining confirmation of the nonexistence of justifiable grounds from the Infrastructure Development Council.

第八十条市町村長は、第六十三条第一項の認定その他この章の規定並びに当該規定に基づく命令及び条例の規定による処分に関する書類であって国土交通省令で定めるものについては、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、閲覧の請求があった場合には、これを閲覧させなければならない。

Article 80The mayor of a municipality shall make documents concerning the certification prescribed in of Article 63, paragraph (1) or any other disposition pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and the provisions of any Order or Ordinance based on the provisions of this Chapter that are specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism available for inspection when requested, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism.