(i)the relationship of being a relative of the person issuing prepaid payment instruments (meaning the prepaid payment instruments prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Act; the same applies hereinafter in this Chapter) (the relevant person is hereinafter referred to as an "issuer" in this paragraph and paragraph (4), item (i) of the following Article), if the relevant person is an individual;

(ii)the relationship in which a corporation directly or indirectly holds voting rights exceeding fifty percent of the voting rights held by all shareholders in another corporation (the voting rights held by all shareholders mean voting rights held by all shareholders, all members, or all equity investors; the same applies hereinafter in this Article (in the case of a stock company, those voting rights exclude those attached to shares which may not be exercised for all particulars that are subject to a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders; and include voting rights attached to shares in respect of which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights under Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); the same applies hereinafter in this Article));

(iii)the relationship between an individual and a corporation in which the individual and their relatives directly or indirectly hold voting rights exceeding fifty percent of the voting rights held by all shareholders in the corporation;

(iv)the relationship between corporations in which the same person (including their relatives, if the person is an individual) directly or indirectly holds voting rights exceeding fifty percent of the voting rights held by all shareholders in the company (the relationship in question excludes the relationship that falls under item (ii)); or

(v)the relationship between an issuer and the person that simultaneously or continuously delivers goods, etc. or provides services that are closely related with and inseparable from the issuer's delivering of goods, etc. or providing of services, if the relevant person exists (the relationship in question excludes the relationship that falls under each of the preceding items).

(i)the proportion of the voting rights attached to shares or equity held by a corporation under its own name in that other corporation (hereinafter referred to as "shares or equity" in this paragraph) (the voting rights in question include those attached to shares or equity that cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Corporate Bonds and Shares (Act No. 75 of 2001) (including cases in which the relevant provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 228, paragraph (1), Article 235, paragraph (1), Article 239, paragraph (1), and Article 276 (limited to the portion relating to item (ii)) of that Act)); and are referred to as "subject voting rights" in the following item) to the voting rights held by all shareholders in that other corporation; and

(ii)the proportion of the subject voting rights attached to the shares or equity that a corporation's subsidiary (meaning a corporation in which the relevant corporation holds shares or equity with the subject voting rights under its own name that exceed fifty percent of the voting rights held by all shareholders; the same applies hereinafter in this item) holds in that other corporation as prescribed in the preceding item under its own name to the voting rights held by all shareholders of that other corporation (or if there are two or more such subsidiaries, the total of proportions calculated for each of them).

(i)passenger tickets for ground, water, and air transportation vehicles;

(ii)admission tickets for the following facilities or places (including attraction tickets for amusement parks and other similar facilities that are issued in combination with ordinary admission tickets):

(iii)beyond what is listed in the preceding two items, meal tickets and other certificates and articles issued in conjunction with the use of a specified facility or place that are designed to be used normally by the users of the relevant facility or place; and

(iv)numbers, marks, or other signs that have a function equivalent to the certificates and articles listed in the preceding three items (excluding those used in the case in which the issuer or the person designated by the issuer delivers goods, etc. or provides services to the users through electric telecommunication lines connecting a computer used by the issuer or the person designated by the issuer with a computer used by the users).

(i)the National Agency for Automobile and Land Transport Technology;

(ii)the Japan Racing Association and the Japan Broadcasting Corporation; and

(iii)port authorities and local road public corporations.

(i)prepaid payment instruments for third-party business (meaning the prepaid payment instruments for third-party business prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (5) of the Act) issued only to the employees of the issuer (including persons belonging to the same household as the relevant employees; hereinafter the same applies in this item) that are designed to be used only by the relevant employees;

(ii)prepaid payment instruments for health care facilities, welfare facilities, or welfare services that are issued by the following persons:

(iii)prepaid payment instruments issued by a person that establishes a school prescribed in Article 1 of the School Education Act (Act No. 26 of 1947) (excluding the State or a local public entity) only to its students, school children or elementary school children, or employees (hereinafter referred to as "students or employees" in this item) (limited to those that are designed to be used only by the relevant students or employees) and other prepaid payment instruments that are specified by Cabinet Office Order as those equivalent to the relevant prepaid payment instruments; and

(iv)beyond the prepaid payment instruments listed in the preceding three items, prepaid payment instruments issued by a person engaging in the business of a kiosk and other facilities for the welfare of employees who work within a certain work area or persons who were the relevant employees (including persons belonging to the same household as these employees or persons; hereinafter referred to as "employees" in this item) (hereinafter referred to as "welfare facilities" in this item) only to its employees (limited to the prepaid payment instruments that are designed to be used only in the welfare facilities for the relevant employees) and other prepaid payment instruments that are specified by Cabinet Office Order as those similar to them.

(i)prepaid payment instruments that are designed to be used for the delivery of goods or provision of services in the specified advance payment transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Installment Sales Act (Act No. 159 of 1961) or the delivery of goods in the advance payment installment sales prescribed in Article 11 of that Act; and

(ii)prepaid payment instruments issued in the transactions of the travel agency business prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (3) of the Travel Agency Act (Act No. 239 of 1952) (excluding the private lodging intermediary service prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8) of the Private Lodging Business Act (Act No. 65 of 2017) (excluding service conducted by the travel agency prescribed in Article 6-4, paragraph (1) of the Travel Agency Act)).

(i)if the geographic area in which the prepaid payment instruments issued by an applicant for registration referred to in Article 10, paragraph (1) of the Act can be used is limited to one municipality (including special wards; and for designated cities referred to in Article 252-19, paragraph (1) of the Local Autonomy Act (Act No. 67 of 1947), including wards or administratively consolidated wards of the relevant cities; the same applies in the following item): ten million yen;

(ii)if an applicant for registration referred to in Article 10, paragraph (1) of the Act satisfies all of the following criteria: zero:

(iii)cases other than those prescribed in the preceding two items: one hundred million yen.

(i)an insurance company and any other person specified by Cabinet Office Order that falls under the category of having a sound level of solvency in terms of its ability to pay insurance proceeds as specified by Cabinet Office Order in consideration of the standard prescribed in Article 130 of the Insurance Business Act (Act No. 105 of 1995); and

(ii)a person that has received the designation prescribed in Article 35-4, paragraph (1) of the Installment Sales Act and has received the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 35-9 of that Act for the business of the relevant guarantee contract to secure security deposits for issuance.

(i)if the unused base date balance (meaning the unused base date balance prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (2) of the Act) as of the immediately preceding base date (meaning the base date prescribed in that paragraph; the same applies in the following item) is ten million yen or less: the full amount of the security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository;

(ii)if the amount required for deposit (meaning the amount required for deposit prescribed in Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Act) as of the preceding base date falls short of the total of the amount of security deposits for issuance (meaning the total of the amount of the security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository, the secured amount (meaning the secured amount prescribed in Article 15 of the Act), and the amount of the trust property (meaning the amount of the trust property prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1) of the Act); the same applies in item (iv) and in item (ii) of the following paragraph) as of the day following the date on which the written report referred to in Article 23, paragraph (1) of the Act for the base date was submitted: any amount within the limit of the amount of the security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository, up to the amount of such shortage;

(iii)if the procedure for the fulfillment of the right referred to in Article 31, paragraph (1) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "right" in this item, the following item, paragraph (3), and Article 11) has been completed, and the unused balance as of the day on which the relevant procedure for the fulfillment of the right has been completed (meaning the amount calculated in accordance with a method specified by Cabinet Office Order as the total amount of (x) the monies that can be used for the full payment of consideration associated with the prepaid payment instruments referred to in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Act, outstanding as of that day, and (y) the monies converted from the quantity of goods, etc. or services that can be requested to be delivered or provided in association with the prepaid payment instruments prescribed in item (ii) of that paragraph, outstanding as of that day; the same applies in the following item) is ten million yen or less: the amount remaining after the amount of costs required for the relevant procedure for the fulfillment of the right is deducted from the amount of security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository; or

(iv)if the procedure for the fulfillment of the right has been completed, and the unused balance as of the day on which the relevant procedure for the fulfillment of the right has been completed exceeds ten million yen: any amount within the limit of the amount remaining after the amount of costs required for the relevant procedure for the fulfillment of the right is deducted from the amount of security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository, up to the amount remaining after half of the unused balance as of that day is deducted from the total of the amount of security deposits for issuance as of that day.

(i)if the unused balance as of the day on which the relevant refund procedure has been completed (meaning the amount calculated in accordance with a method specified by Cabinet Office Order as the total amount of (x) the monies that can be used for the full payment of consideration associated with the prepaid payment instruments referred to in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Act, outstanding as of that day, and (y) the monies converted from the quantity of goods, etc. or services that can be requested to be delivered or provided in association with the prepaid payment instruments referred to in item (ii) of that paragraph, outstanding as of that day; the same applies in the following item) is ten million yen or less: the full amount of the security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository; or

(ii)if the unused balance as of the day on which the relevant refund procedure has been completed exceeds ten million yen: any amount within the limit of the amount of security deposits for issuance that are retained at the official depository, up to the amount remaining after half of the unused balance as of that day is deducted from the total of the amount of security deposits for issuance as of that day.

(i)deposit-taking institutions;

(ii)trust companies;

(iii)if bankruptcy proceedings have been commenced against the relevant issuer of prepaid payment instruments, the bankruptcy trustee;

(iv)if reorganization proceedings have been commenced against the relevant issuer of prepaid payment instruments, the trustee; and

(v)if rehabilitation proceedings have been commenced against the relevant issuer of prepaid payment instruments, the trustee (limited to cases in which a trustee has been appointed for the relevant rehabilitation proceedings).

(i)when the registration under Article 7, paragraph (3) of the Trust Business Act (including cases in which the relevant provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 54, paragraph (2) of that Act) has not been renewed;

(ii)when the license under Article 3 of the Trust Business Act has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 44, paragraph (1) of that Act;

(iii)when the registration under Article 7, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 45, paragraph (1) of that Act;

(iv)when the license under Article 3 or Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act or the registration under Article 7, paragraph (1) or Article 54, paragraph (1) of that Act has ceased to be valid pursuant to the provisions of Article 46, paragraph (1) of that Act (including cases in which the relevant provisions are applied pursuant to Article 63, paragraph (1) of that Act following the deemed replacement of terms);

(v)when the license under Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 59, paragraph (1) of that Act;

(vi)when the registration under Article 54, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 60, paragraph (1) of that Act.

(i)when a corporation has had its registration under Article 62-3 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 62-22, paragraph (1) or (2), had its license under Article 63-23 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 63-37, paragraph (1) or (2), or had its license under Article 64, paragraph (1) of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 82, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them or a representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(ii)when a corporation has received an order to discontinue its specified funds transfer services (meaning the specified funds transfer services prescribed in Article 36-2, paragraph (4) of the Act; the same applies hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) of the Act as applied pursuant to Article 37-2, paragraph (2) of the Act following the deemed replacement of terms, or received an order to discontinue its electronic payment instruments services pursuant to the provisions of Article 62-22, paragraph (1) of the Act as applied pursuant to Article 62-8, paragraph (2) of the Act following the deemed replacement of terms, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them or a representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the order, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(iii)when a corporation has had its license under Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or 28 of that Act, had its authorization under Article 52-9, paragraph (1) of that Act or the proviso to paragraph (2) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-15, paragraph (1) of that Act, had its authorization under Article 52-17, paragraph (1) of that Act or the proviso to paragraph (3) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-34, paragraph (1) of that Act, had its permission under Article 52-36, paragraph (1) of that Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of that Act, or had its registration under Article 52-60-3 of that Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-60-23, paragraph (1) or (3) of that Act, a person who was a director (including a representative person in Japan who is deemed to be a director under Article 47, paragraph (2) of that Act), executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(iv)when a corporation has had its license under Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act (Act No. 187 of 1952) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or 28 of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, had its authorization under Article 16-2-2, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act or the proviso to paragraph (2) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-15, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, had its authorization under Article 16-2-4, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act or the proviso to paragraph (3) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-34, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, or had its permission under Article 16-5, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, or company auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(v)when a corporation has had its license under Article 4 of the Shinkin Bank Act (Act No. 238 of 1951) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or 28 of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act, had its permission under Article 85-2, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph (5) of the Shinkin Bank Act, or had its registration under Article 85-3, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-60-23, paragraph (1) or (3) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph (7) of the Shinkin Bank Act, a person who was a board member or auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(vi)when a corporation has had its license under Article 6 of the Labor Bank Act (Act No. 227 of 1953) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 95 of that Act or had its permission under Article 89-3, paragraph (1) of that Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 94, paragraph (3) of the Labor Bank Act, a person who was a board member or auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(vii)when a corporation has received a dissolution order pursuant to the provisions of Article 106, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act (Act No. 181 of 1949) or pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or 28 of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives (Act No. 183 of 1949), had its permission under Article 6-3, paragraph (1) of that Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6-4-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives, or had its registration under Article 6-4-3, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-60-23, paragraph (1) or (3) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6-5, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives, a person who was a board member or auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation (or in the case of a dissolution order, before the day on which the relevant dissolution order was issued; hereinafter the same applies in this item through item (x)), and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(viii)when a corporation has had its permission under Article 92-2, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act (Act No. 132 of 1947) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92-4, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act, or an agricultural cooperative or federation of agricultural cooperatives has received a dissolution order pursuant to the provisions of Article 95-2 of that Act, a person who was a board member or auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(ix)when a corporation has had its permission under Article 106, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 108, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act, or a fisheries cooperative, federation of fisheries cooperatives, fishery processing cooperative, or federation of fishery processing cooperatives has received a dissolution order pursuant to the provisions of Article 124-2 of that Act, a person who was a board member or auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(x)when a corporation has had its permission under Article 95-2, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act (Act No. 93 of 2001) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95-4, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act, or received a dissolution order pursuant to the provisions of Article 86 of that Act, a person who was a board member, management committee member, or auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(xi)when a corporation has had its authorization under Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Shoko Chukin Bank Limited Act (Act No. 74 of 2007) or the proviso to paragraph (2) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 13, paragraph (1) of that Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, or company auditor of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(xii)when a corporation had its registration under Article 12 of the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services (Act No. 101 of 2000) (limited to the registration related to the category of deposit, etc. intermediary business operations prescribed in Article 11, paragraph (2) of that Act; the same applies in item (xvi)) pursuant to the provisions of Article 38, paragraph (1) (excluding items (iii) to (v)) of that Act, a person who was an officer (meaning the officer prescribed n Article 15, item (i), (r) of that Act; the same applies in item (xxviii)) of the relevant corporation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(xiii)when a corporation had received a license, permission, authorization, or registration (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration; hereinafter the same applies in this item) of the same kind as the license, permission, authorization, or registration prescribed in item (i) or item (iii) through the preceding item in a foreign state, but has had the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration of the same kind revoked, had the renewal of the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration refused, received an order to discontinue its business operations of the same kind as those for the specified funds transfer services or the electronic payment instruments services (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant order; hereinafter the same applies in this item), or received a dissolution order, pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the relevant foreign state equivalent to the Act, the Banking Act, etc., or the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation (or in the case of a refusal of renewal, before the day on which the relevant disposition was made, in the case of an order to discontinue business, before the relevant order to discontinue business was issued, or in the case of a dissolution order, before the day on which the relevant dissolution order was issued), and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(xiv)a person who has had their authorization under Article 52-9, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act or the proviso to paragraph (2) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-15, paragraph (1) of that Act, had their authorization under Article 16-2-2, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act or the proviso to paragraph (2) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-15, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, or had their authorization under Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Shoko Chukin Bank Limited Act or the proviso to paragraph (2) of that Article revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 13, paragraph (1) of that Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the revocation;

(xv)a person who has had their permission under Article 52-36, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of that Act, had their permission under Article 16-5, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, had their permission under Article 85-2, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph (5) of the Shinkin Bank Act, had their permission under Article 89-3, paragraph (1) of the Labor Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 94, paragraph (3) of the Labor Bank Act, had their permission under Article 6-3, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6-4-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives, had their permission under Article 92-2, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92-4, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act, had their permission under Article 106, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 108, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act, or had their permission under Article 95-2, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95-4, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the revocation;

(xvi)a person who has had their registration under Article 12 of the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services pursuant to the provisions of Article 38, paragraph (1) (excluding item (iii) to item (v)) of that Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the revocation;

(xvii)a person who had received an authorization, permission, or registration (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant authorization, permission, or registration; hereinafter the same applies in this item) of the same kind as the authorization, permission, or registration prescribed in the preceding three items in a foreign state, but has had the relevant authorization, permission, or registration of the same kind revoked, or had the renewal of the relevant authorization, permission, or registration refused pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the relevant foreign state corresponding to the Banking Act, the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, the Shinkin Bank Act, the Labor Bank Act, the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives, the Agricultural Cooperatives Act, the Fisheries Cooperatives Act, the Norinchukin Bank Act, the Shoko Chukin Bank Limited Act, or the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the revocation (or in the case of a refusal of renewal, since the day on which the person received the relevant disposition);

(xviii)a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, board member, or auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 63-37, paragraph (2), Article 67, paragraph (3) or Article 82, paragraph (2) of the Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xix)a director (including a representative person in Japan who is deemed to be a director pursuant to Article 47, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act), executive officer, accounting advisor, or company auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or Article 52-34, paragraph (1) of that Act, or an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of that Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xx)a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, or company auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or Article 52-34, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, or an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxi)a board member or auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act, or an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph (3) of the Shinkin Bank Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxii)a board member or auditor whose replacement was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 95, paragraph (1) of the Labor Bank Act, or an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 94, paragraph (3) of the Labor Bank Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxiii)a board member or auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives, or an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6-4-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxiv)an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92-4, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act, or an officer whose reselection was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 95, paragraph (2) of that Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxv)an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 108, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act, or an officer whose reselection was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph (2) of that Act, and whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxvi)an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-56, paragraph (2) of the Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95-4, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act, or a board member, management committee member, or auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 86 of that Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxvii)a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, or company auditor whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 60 of the Shoko Chukin Bank Limited Act, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition;

(xxviii)an officer whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of Article 38, paragraph (3) (excluding item (ii)) of the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which the officer received the relevant disposition; and

(xxix)a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to the Act, the Banking Act, etc., and the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, and for whom five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition.

(i)the categories of funds transfer services other than the category of funds transfer services set forth in the following item: the amount arrived at when ten million yen is divided by the number of categories of funds transfer services provided by the funds transfer service provider (that number of categories excludes the category of funds transfer services set forth in that item; and if the amount thus arrived at has a number to the right of the ten-thousand place, it is rounded down to the nearest 10,000 yen); and

(ii)the type III funds transfer services (meaning the type III funds transfer services prescribed in Article 36-2, paragraph (3) of the Act; hereinafter the same applies in this item, Article 17, paragraph (1), item (i), and Article 17-3, paragraph (2), item (ii)) (limited to cases in which the rate of management by bank deposits or savings (meaning the rate of management by bank deposits or savings prescribed in Article 45-2, paragraph (1) of the Act; the same applies in Article 17-3, paragraph (2), item (ii)) of the type III funds transfer services provided by the funds transfer service provider is 100 percent): zero yen.

(i)the category of funds transfer services subject to the relevant guarantee contract to secure performance security deposits; and

(ii)if the counterparty to the relevant guarantee contract to secure performance security deposits receives an order of the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency under Article 46 of the Act, performance security deposits will be made to the official depository without delay on behalf of the relevant funds transfer service provider in the amount referred to in the order.

(i)an insurance company and any other persons specified by Cabinet Office Order that falls under the category of having a sound level of solvency in terms of its ability to pay insurance proceeds as specified by Cabinet Office Order in consideration of the standard prescribed in Article 130 of the Insurance Business Act; and

(ii)a person that has received the designation prescribed in Article 35-4, paragraph (1) of the Installment Sales Act and has received the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 35-9 of that Act for the business of the relevant guarantee contract to secure performance security deposits.

(i)if the amount required for deposit (meaning the amount required for deposit as prescribed in Article 47, item (i) of the Act) as of the immediately preceding calculation date in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services (meaning each business day for the type I funds transfer services (meaning the type I funds transfer services prescribed in Article 36-2, paragraph (1) of the Act), and the base date prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act for the Type II funds transfer services (meaning the type II funds transfer services prescribed in Article 36-2, paragraph (2) of the Act) and the type III funds transfer services; hereinafter the same applies in this item) falls short of the total of the amount of performance security deposits (meaning the total of the amount of performance security deposits that are retained at the official depository, the secured amount (meaning the secured amount prescribed in Article 44 of the Act), and the amount of the trust property (meaning the amount of the trust property prescribed in Article 45, paragraph (1) of the Act); the same applies in item (iii) and paragraph (3), item (ii)) in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services as of the calculation date: any amount within the limit of the amount of the performance security deposits that are retained at the official depository in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services, up to the amount of that shortage;

(ii)if the procedure for the fulfillment of the right referred to in Article 59, paragraph (1) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "right" in this item, the following item, paragraph (4), and Article 19) has been completed with regard to the whole of the relevant category of funds transfer services: the amount remaining after the amount of costs required for the relevant procedure for the fulfillment of the right is deducted from the amount of performance security deposits that are retained at the official depository in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services; and

(iii)if the procedure for the fulfillment of the right has been completed with regard to a part of the relevant category of funds transfer services: any amount within the limit of the amount arrived at when the amount of costs required for the procedure for the fulfillment of the right is deducted from the amount of the performance security deposits that are retained at the official depository in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services, up to the amount remaining after the amount required for performance security deposits prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (2) of the Act in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services as of the day on which the relevant procedure for the fulfillment of the right has been completed (or if that day is not a business day, the amount required for performance security deposits as of the immediately preceding business day) is deducted from the total of the performance security deposits for the relevant category of funds transfer services as of that day.

(i)if the funds transfer service provider has performed the obligations to be borne in relation to fund transfer transactions that it carries out as the funds transfer services it is intending to discontinue; or

(ii)if the funds transfer service provider is unable to perform its obligations to be borne in relation to fund transfer transactions that it carries out as the funds transfer services it is intending to discontinue due to grounds not attributable thereto and has given a public notice of that fact pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Order, and no claims have been stated with regard to the relevant obligations from their creditors after thirty days have elapsed since the date of the relevant public notice.

(i)if the funds transfer service provider intends to discontinue the whole of one category of funds transfer services: the full amount of the performance security deposits are retained at the official depository in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services; and

(ii)if the funds transfer service provider intends to discontinue a part of one category of funds transfer services: any amount within the limit of the amount of the performance security deposits that are retained at the official depository in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services, up to the amount remaining after the amount required for performance security deposits prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (2) of the Act in relation to the relevant category of funds transfer services as of the day on which it came to fall under either of the items of the preceding paragraph (or if that day is not a business day, the amount required for performance security deposits as of the immediately preceding business day) is deducted from the total of the performance security deposits for the relevant category of funds transfer services as of that day.

(i)a funds transfer service provider providing only the funds transfer services under the special provisions (meaning the funds transfer services under the special provisions prescribed in Article 58-2, paragraph (1) of the Act; the same applies in the following item): ten million yen;

(ii)a funds transfer service provider other than the one set forth in the preceding item (limited to the case in which the category of funds transfer services that it provides other than the funds transfer services under the special provisions is the type III funds transfer services (limited to cases in which the rate of management by bank deposits or savings of their type III funds transfer services is 100 percent)): ten million yen; and

(iii)a funds transfer service provider other than those set forth in the preceding two items: 6,660,000 yen.

(i)deposit-taking institutions;

(ii)trust companies;

(iii)if bankruptcy proceedings have been commenced against the relevant funds transfer service provider, the bankruptcy trustee;

(iv)if reorganization proceedings have been commenced against the relevant funds transfer service provider, the trustee; and

(v)if rehabilitation proceedings have been commenced against the relevant funds transfer service provider, the trustee (limited to cases in which a trustee has been appointed for the relevant rehabilitation proceedings).

(i)the fact that provisional distribution will be carried out;

(ii)the maximum amount of provisional distribution per creditor or fund transfer transaction;

(iii)the period for requesting provisional distribution;

(iv)the method of provisional distribution;

(v)documents and other articles to be submitted or presented to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency when a creditor requests provisional distribution; and

(vi)other particulars determined to be necessary by the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency.

(i)when a corporation has had its registration under Article 37 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, had its registration under Article 63-2 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 63-17, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, had its license under Article 63-23 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 63-37, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, or had its license under Article 64, paragraph (1) revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 82, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them or a representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(ii)persons set forth in the items of Article 13 (excluding item (i) and item (xiii)); and

(iii)when a corporation had received a license, permission, authorization, or registration (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration; hereinafter the same applies in this item) of the same kind as the license, permission, authorization, or registration prescribed in Article 13, items (iii) to (xii) or item (i) of this Article in a foreign state, but has had the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration of the same kind revoked, had the renewal of the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration refused, received an order to discontinue its business operations of the same kind as those for the specified funds transfer services or the electronic payment instruments services (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant order; hereinafter the same applies in this item), or received a dissolution order, pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the relevant foreign state equivalent to the Act, the Baking Act, etc., or the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation (or in the case of a refusal of renewal, before the day on which the relevant disposition was made, in the case of an order to discontinue business, before the relevant order to discontinue business was issued, or in the case of a dissolution order, before the day on which the relevant dissolution order was issued), and for whom five years have not passed since that date.

(i)deposit-taking institutions: when the license under Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 27 or 28 of that Act or other cases specified by Cabinet Office Order;

(ii)funds transfer service providers: when the registration under Article 37 of the Act has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act; and

(iii)specified trust companies; when falling under any of the items of Article 12-5.

(i)an officer of the electronic payment instruments service provider (in the case of a foreign electronic payment instruments service provider, including a person treated in the same manner as an officer under the laws and regulations of a foreign state and the representative person in Japan; if the officer is a corporation, including a person who is to perform the duties thereof) or an employee of the electronic payment instruments service provider;

(ii)a parent corporation, etc. or subsidiary corporation, etc. of the electronic payment instruments service provider;

(iii)an individual who holds voting rights exceeding fifty percent of the voting rights held by all shareholders in the electronic payment instruments service provider (excluding voting rights attached to shares which may not be exercised for all particulars that are subject to a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders; and including voting rights attached to shares in respect of which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights under Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act) (referred to as a "specified individual shareholder" in item (iv) of the following paragraph) (excluding the persons set forth in item (i)); and

(iv)a person specified by Cabinet Office Order as being equivalent to any of the persons set forth in the preceding three items.

(i)a parent company, etc. of the electronic payment instruments service provider;

(ii)a subsidiary company, etc. of the parent company, etc. set forth in the preceding item (excluding the electronic payment instruments service provider and those set forth in item (i) of the following paragraph);

(iii)an affiliated company, etc. of the parent company, etc. set forth in item (i) (excluding those set forth in item (ii) of the following paragraph);

(iv)any of the following companies, partnerships, or other equivalent business entities (including those corresponding to these entities in a foreign state and excluding the electronic payment instruments service provider and those set forth in the preceding three items and the items of the following paragraph; hereinafter referred to as a "company, etc." in this item) pertaining to the specified individual shareholder:

(i)a subsidiary company, etc. of the electronic payment instruments service provider; and

(ii)an affiliated company, etc. of the electronic payment instruments service provider.

(i)the particulars concerning fees, remuneration or any other consideration payable by users in relation to a contract for specified electronic payment instruments transactions (meaning the contract for specified electronic payment instruments transactions prescribed in Article 62-17, paragraph (1) of the Act) that are specified by Cabinet Office Order;

(ii)in cases where there is a risk of a loss arising in connection with a user's conclusion of a contract for specified electronic payment instruments transactions as a direct result of fluctuations in the value of currencies or any other indicators, the following particulars:

(iii)the particulars specified by Cabinet Office Order as being equivalent to the particulars set forth in the preceding two items.

(i)in cases where there is a risk of a loss arising in connection with a user's conclusion of a contract for specified electronic payment instruments transactions as a direct result of fluctuations in the value of currencies or any other indicators, the fact that there is such a risk; and

(ii)the particulars specified by Cabinet Office Order as being equivalent to the particulars set forth in the preceding item.

(i)when a corporation has had its registration under Article 62-3 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 62-22, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, or had its registration of the same type (including other administrative disposition similar to the relevant registration), which the corporation had obtained in a foreign state, revoked pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the relevant foreign state equivalent to the Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them or a representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(ii)when a corporation received an order to discontinue its electronic payment instruments services pursuant to the provisions of Article 62-22, paragraph 81) of the Act as applied pursuant to Article 62-8, paragraph (2) following the deemed replacement of terms, or received an order to discontinue its business operations of the same kind as those for the electronic payment instruments services (including other administrative disposition similar to the relevant order), a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them or a representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the order, and for whom five years have not passed since that date; and

(iii)a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them whose dismissal was ordered pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to the Act, if five years have not passed since the day on which they received the relevant disposition.

(i)when a corporation has had its registration under Article 37 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, had its registration under Article 62-3 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 62-22, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, or had its license under Article 64, paragraph (1) of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 82, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them or a representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(ii)persons set forth in the items of Article 13 (excluding item (i) and item (xiii)); and

(iii)when a corporation had received a license, permission, authorization, or registration (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration; hereinafter the same applies in this item) of the same kind as the license, permission, authorization, or registration prescribed in Article 13, item (iii) through item (xii) or in item (i) of this Article in a foreign state, but has had the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration of the same kind revoked, had the renewal of the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration refused, received an order to discontinue its business operations of the same kind as those for the specified funds transfer services or the electronic payment instruments services (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant order; hereinafter the same applies in this item), or received a dissolution order, pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the relevant foreign state equivalent to the Act, the Banking Act, etc., or the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation (or in the case of a refusal of renewal, before the day on which the relevant disposition was made, in the case of an order to discontinue business, before the relevant order to discontinue business was issued, or in the case of a dissolution order, before the day on which the relevant dissolution order was issued), and for whom five years have not passed since that date.

(i)when a corporation has had its registration under Article 37 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, had its registration under Article 62-3 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 62-22, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, or had its license under Article 63-23 of the Act revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 63-37, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them, or representative person in Japan of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation, and for whom five years have not passed since that date;

(ii)persons set forth in the items of Article 13 (excluding item (i) and item (xiii)); and

(iii)when a corporation had received a license, permission, authorization, or registration (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration; hereinafter the same applies in this item) of the same kind as the license, permission, authorization, or registration prescribed in Article 13, item (iii) through item (xii) or in item (i) of this Article, but has had the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration of the same kind revoked, had the renewal of the relevant license, permission, authorization, or registration refused, received an order to discontinue its business operations of the same kind as those for the specified funds transfer services or the electronic payment instruments services (including other administrative dispositions similar to the relevant order; hereinafter the same applies in this item), or received a dissolution order, pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the relevant foreign state equivalent to the Act, the Banking Act, etc., or the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services, a person who was a director, executive officer, accounting advisor, company auditor, or any other person equivalent to them of the relevant corporation within thirty days before the date of the revocation (or in the case of a refusal of renewal, before the day on which the relevant disposition was made, in the case of an order to discontinue business, before the relevant order to discontinue business was issued, or in the case of a dissolution order, before the day on which the relevant dissolution order was issued), and for whom five years have not passed since that date.

(i)name;

(ii)location of the office; and

(iii)names of officers and names of members.

(i)designation under Article 156-39, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act; and

(ii)designations listed in the items of Article 26.

(i)designation under Article 35-2, paragraph (1) of the Mutual Loan Business Act (Act No. 42 of 1931);

(ii)designation under Article 12-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution (Act No. 43 of 1943);

(iii)designation under Article 92-6, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act;

(iv)designation under Article 118, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act;

(v)designation under Article 69-2, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act;

(vi)designation under Article 6-5-12, paragraph (1) of the Act on Financial Business by Cooperatives;

(vii)designation under Article 85-12, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act;

(viii)designation under Article 16-8, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act;

(ix)designation under Article 89-13, paragraph (1) of the Labor Bank Act;

(x)designation under Article 52-62, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act;

(xi)designation under Article 41-39, paragraph (1) of the Money Lending Business Act (Act No. 32 of 1983);

(xii)designation under Article 308-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act;

(xiii)designation under Article 51, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Provision of and the Development of Environment for Using Financial Services;

(xiv)designation under Article 95-6, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act; and

(xv)designation under Article 85-2, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act.

(i)granting of a license under Article 64, paragraph (1) of the Act;

(ii)revocation of the license under Article 64, paragraph (1) of the Act pursuant to the provisions of Article 82, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act; and

(iii)issuance of notification of the dispositions set forth in Article 85, item (i) or (ii) of the Act to the Minister of Finance pursuant to the provisions of that Article.